-
Posts
9,271 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
49
Everything posted by szkocjasid
-
If the choice is between Heeps & Hume (my pick) for their last rider, would anyone look at Dillon Ruml or Broc Nicol instead?
-
The comments I read suggested as well as Brennan (4.40) being in the team & Lidsey (5.16) at reserve, we'd also see King (8.05) at number one for Redcar not Riss (8.24)? So I assumed the British reduction rules were the same & couldn't think of a previous time team building averages weren't used for riding order!
-
My thoughts indeed, means the club can just do the same thing again & again! I'm sure it wouldn't have harmed Kemp's relationship with the club if he politely pointed out they offered him a spot, but then picked someone else?
-
I'd have King & Riss at 1+5. Shanes at 2. Wright 3 & Hume 4. Also like to see the weakest reserve at 7, especially as I think Edwards has the ability to beat opposition second strings riding at number 6.
-
IOW team looks to be just below NL standard. Dropping a heat leader to run with, 2 heat leaders, 2 second strings & 2 reserves? Ben Morley (9.29) Henry Atkins (7.24) Rhys Naylor (4.52) George Congreave (4.50) Aaran Butcher (4.36) Wayne Parker (3.00) 32.91
-
What happened whe Adam Roynon got injured in a pre-season GB event at Kings Lynn? Did he get SRBF money? Perhaps having the event at a UK track covered him?
-
Not just racing in Poland, what about grasstrack, stockcars, flat track or Nora 92 meetings? I'm sure riders must have insurance for these meetings too?
-
Totally agree with that comment!
-
So what riding order do people expect to see in 2023?
-
Does seen incredibly childish & unprofessional of the SCB to try & stop the Nora 92 league imo. Kinda wanna see what would happen if Plymouth & Kent called their bluff, would the SCB really want to let to clubs leave? Another point of view, what if the Kent & Plymouth stadium owners find out they are losing 4 matches (4 x rent) because of the SCB & asked the Speedway promotions to make up the loss?
-
Not sure how that could be an issue, when riders also race grasstrack, long track & foreign leagues too. It's not like they are racing Championship/NDL matches & nothing else!
-
Maybe should have just asked this question on the Plymouth 2023 thread. There's was no need for this question to have its own thread tbh!
-
Why show them to a rider who hasn't signed a contract for you then?
-
The funny thing is, fans spent all season moaning about certain teams using guests & not signing a replacement only to complain when Belle Vue do the exact opposite!
-
I've heard that rule mentioned on here many times, but until I see it happen won't believe it! The last instance I can find of this happening is at Birmingham in 2019. James Shanes finished 2018 on a 5.09 ave, with British reduction starts 2019 on a 4.96 ave. He rides at reserve with Tobias Thomsen on a 5.00 ave starting in the team! Unless the rules have changed since then?
-
A rider refusing to ride on a track he thinks is dangerous, has to be the best excuse available for not racing
-
If Pearson has a 9.00 ave? Belle Vue James Pearson 9.00 Jack Smith 8.36 Sam Hagon 6.18 Matt Marson 5.48 Luke Muff 4.78 Freddie Hodder 4.52 Jack Shimelt 3.00 Total 41.32
-
Is Pearson on an 8.00 average? Edinburgh have 9.03 left for their final rider, makes me think they are signing Hook on a 9.00 ave, making the Belle Vue team 42.99!
-
Can't agree with Buster at all here, dropping Holder is fine, that's his prerogative but to only announce it after the transfer window has closed is childish & unprofessional!
-
Can't say I understand your philosophy. If Buster thought Holder would walk out on the club mid-season then why hold talks at all?
-
Should be one of the top riders in the league!
-
Personally I'd definitely have the top 2 at 1+5. King should beat the opposition reserve in heat 12, so you're looking at Ipswich gaining a possible 2 point advantage using Emil in that heat, compared to a possible 4 point advantage in heat 13 (where I'd expect King to be 4th).