szkocjasid

But the change couldn't have happened without Bombers agreement. If he doesn't agree to the swap, Peterborough have no replacement for Worrall & Leicester can't sign Cook for Batchelor.

The way I see it both Bomber & Richie Worrall had to have agreed to the changes. Peterborough can't drop Worrall till they have a replacement lined up, likewise Leicester can't drop Harris till they have a replacement lined up. If Harris doesn't agree to leave - he can't end up at Peterborough because Worrall isn't available - because Harris isn't replacing him - Harris can't get dropped without being willing to swap clubs!

Wolves 48-42 Leicester Edit: this is my prediction lol!

Peterborough 42-48 Ipswich

Belle Vue 47-43 Sheffield

Very true, the bottom 4 clubs could call off home fixtures against Poole & Oxford to gain 2 unlikely points.

I saw that and was shocked at how quickly Lawson slowed up & I think Worrall was too.

I didn't think Boxall was woeful at all, he wasn't getting out of the starts, which is a killer at Berwick, but tried hard & was on the pace

I would have to say it depends on a match to match basis. For example of you have a rider like Dayle Wood who (no offence) isn't going to beat anyone, it makes sense to give Fredriksen / Clegg the easier rides to score as many as possible. But of you have a rider like Coles who could have the beating of Roynon in heats 2,4,8 then leave Boxall to beat the second strings in the harder races?

I originally thought of Joe T, unsure if he is fit again, but now realise if he is fit, would be riding for Leicester's NL team.

Not really, regardless of who is at 6 or 7, the team manager could swap the reserves over in every heat if he wanted to.

Best wishes to Roynon & the cameraman.

I didn't think that was ever a question. Kelleher is a 4.00 Champ rider, Wood is a 4.00 NL rider.

Edinburgh 42-48 Poole

I have to admit, I most look forward to people's opinions on how a match will go & see if I agree with the majority. Sadly I tend to find 6 pages talking about the weather, 3 pages talking about clubs that don't stream (on Glasgow & Oxford pages) and 1 page actually talking about the match.

I wonder that the guest plan was before Redcar was postponed?

Maybe he means not having to go to Poole, where they prepare the track for the home team lol!

Gotta agree, r/r for Kye (so Josh gets an extra ride) seems the obvious choice. Possible guests for Paco: Gilkes, Bowtell or Dan T?

I have to agree with @Beirao that Basso should be at 5. Looks a weak pairing when Brennan rides with the reserves imo. If Brennan & Vissing don't ride well together, why not try Vissing at 2 and Nowak at 4?

Makes a lot of sense

Yet he still gets non stop grief by many on the Ipswich page!

As it is Hans first appearance at Sheilfield this year, I think I would have put Leon at 5?

Had to be lower than Jonas as he had already guested for him

Both teams are 99.99% in the play-offs regardless of the result anyway

Just to be really pedantic, should Woffy get a 28 day ban for "witholding his services" Of course not, because he hadn't agreed to ride in this match (presumably the contract he signed starts from Monday). So my question is, why would Sheffield want to sign Woffy before Thursday & why would the BSPL allow the signing knowing he wasn't available, are neither worried about the "integrity" of the Sport? If we act like these are two separate promotions, it's out of order for Sheffield to turn up at Leicester without a full team (when it's totally avoidable) as it could harm their crowd, I almost feel like Sheffield should get a guest at the away match, but use the 75% guest at their next home match, so it only hinders their crowd?