szkocjasid

Who would Berwick sign for Cook. No point making a change, unless they new rider is better than guest options. Missing an 8+ number one isn't a bad thing in the Champ. Of course you want a full team, but on paper Berwick should be able to cover till Cook returns.

Makes a real difference to the Workington team if Bowes can keep up the heat leader scoring.

Bowtell should have been a trump card dripping to reserve, not happened so far. Joe T can score double figures some matches, but also run lots of last places. Not easy to know what you'll get from Plymouth.

After a poor start think Plymouth will be relieved to keep it close, gives them a chance of the bonus point. Oxford probably feeling the opposite, before the match would have said a 4 point win was decent as they were missing riders, but after such a great start, won't be so happy.

Yeah, was thinking the same thing too.

Loss of the bonus point won't hurt Poole, but very valuable for Workington as they chase the top 4.

Not direct rivals then, if Perry helps Plymouth win, won't knock Glasgow out of the top 4, for example.

I'm always have a curious look to see if a guest could help or hinder his team. (Edwards) Redcar & Oxford are rivals for a top 4 spot, so you'd expect Redcar to prefer a Plymouth victory, so Edwards could be harming Redcar's chances if he helps Oxford win. (Ritchings) No issues (Kennedy) you could argue Plymouth are Scunthorpe's rivals for the wooden spoon, but I don't really consider that a reason for him to turn down a guest booking. (Perry) Plymouth not rivals of Glasgow, no issues.

Real chance for Plymouth here, arguably strengthened by their missing riders, while Oxford are weakened.

Quite a few guests in this one!

If Birmingham had any tactical nous, they only should have made the swap on the agreement that Edwards would regain his place when fit. Just be honest with Hagon from the start "you have a temporary team spot". I'm sure Hagon wouldn't have turned that down - he had no other Premiership options. Can't believe how inept the team planning has been!

But Birmingham look weaker than they did earlier in the season, so Ipswich shouldn't have to be as good to score 60? Brummies won't have a reserve like Lynn did to cause trouble.

Another way to look at it, Starke beat Harrison, which Cairns couldn't do in heat 2. Starke then had a second place behind Steve Worrall. Starke then had the struggling Declan Kennedy taken out of a heat & lost to Zaine & Mountain. Starke then faced Mountain & tac sub Worrall! Who should Starke have beaten that he didn't? Worrall or Mountain (who Cairns didn't meet)? You wouldn't expect a 4 point away reserve to beat a 5 point home reserve (Zaine)! Now Cairns obviously came on string as the match went on, beating Zaine twice, which is brilliant for a 2 pointer, I take nothing away from him. But you can't deny Starke had harder rides & scored the same. That's not saying Cairns should have done better, just that Starke is being harshly judged imo.

Should be 60+ to Ipswich.

If you look at away points gained minus home points dropped, Berwick are joint third along with Edinburgh & Redcar. Even if they only win home matches, still in with a chance. If they start picking up some bonus points & they're certainly contenders.

Then they shouldn't have announced it was a mutual decision. They did exactly that, so it's fair to ridicule their team building!

First thought when I saw the scores, brilliant decision to retain Hagon over Edwards. Even Sudden Sam wouldn't have done that lol!

Hard to know how good JJ will be, but credit to Berwick for making a signing. Even if he drops a point off his assessed average still strengthens the team. Certainly play-off challengers.

Even bigger gap if you look at their Champ aves.

That was just an example. If Flint is one of the top 3 Brits then obviously use him, it's not like I'm suggesting GB not put their best team out. Not that this was their best 3 anyway.

If the plan all along was for Flint to be a non-riding reserve, should they just have taken someone else who didn't have a British league match that weekend? Drew Kemp for example? No offence to Flint, but he's not going to be the difference between GB winning & losing. Plus how much "experience" can he gain just by taking part in practice (if they had one). Of course if the plan was to share out the rides, but Flint was clearly slowest in practice, more understandable.

Seems a terrible attitude to have, does that mean you don't mind riders risking injury as long as they're not heat leaders?

Then of I was Birmingham I wouldn't say it was a mutual decision, just say "we're disappointed Jason doesn't want to return". At least that way, they're letting the fans know they aren't trying to weaken the team.

The old Elite League fast track format was like that. I thought it was a really good format, heat leaders meet more often, reserves meet more often, should mean closer racing, which is beneficial to the fans & help develop the riders too.

Berwick are unbeaten at home. Like you say, good replacement for Hume & they're in with a good chance.