szkocjasid

I just can't imagine Flint leaving Berwick tbh

That would be some trick to avoid the 3 date rule, avoid offering any for 3 months lol! I'm guessing the rule must be clubs can refuse 2 dates, but have to pick one of 3 offered? So a rain-off would probably mean offer 3 more dates?

Can't be that inconsistent as he's got a higher average than Redcar's current heat leaders, which could actually go against him, as I'd expect more improvement from King or Wright with their averages. In a weaker league, I think Kerr is a surefire number one, but I'd pick King & Wright before him.

I just hope it's a sensible ruling, i.e a 4* & 2* rider or 2 x 3* riders, not a ruling that means riders on 2.01 aves get dropped for a new 2.00 rider!

Ablitt has upped his average, riding mainly at number 6 (harder rides). Mountain was awesome at number 7, but looks like a solid 5 point rider when in the team (not slagging him off, not every rider make it to HL level). I'd disagree with the last comment, if some top riders are dropping out, then the gap between strongest & weakest riders should be smaller & racing should logically be closer?

In 2015 Edinburgh started with 2 x 3.00 riders (Branford & Clegg) when they didn't have to have any, the following year every team had to include a 3.00 rider, so what happened Edinburgh had to drop one of their 3.50 averaged reserves. I hope a similar thing doesn't happen to Hagon / Trigger! I realise there has to be a cut-off for rising stars, but I hope it's not 2.00.

I'm gonna have to side with Lynn here. If other Leicester riders find out you can get an extra £20 a point, they'll all ask for it, and Leicester could go bust. Lawson is a good rider, but not the sort that will turn an average team into a league winning team

If it's a challenge match yes, if it's an official fixture no!

Trying to pick a team where all riders have a Workington connection: Workington Craig Cook 8.52 Richard Lawson 8.48 Thomas Jorgensen 6.39 Connor Bailey 5.23 Ty Proctor 4.00 Ace Pijper 3.17 Luke Harrison 2.00 Total 37.79

There's clearly more than 9 available, wether they are up to the correct standard is up for debate. I'd certainly prefer an RS rule to be under 3.50, feel it's a shame if the riders just above 2 (up to Pijper) could miss out.

Nothing to do with Leicester, but assuming Kinsley was under 2.3, this fits. R.Douglas 9.38 C.Harris 8.76 S.Nicholls 8.24 V.Tarasenko 5.00 C.Bailey 4.32 H.Atkins 2.00 R.Kinsley 2.??

Hadn't looked at fixture clashes, just thought it would be better to have a Leicester team than a select team.

Should just allow Leicester to race with their full team, using Lion Cubs to fill gaps caused by Lawson racing for Poole & the banned Worrall imo. 1. Max Fricke 12.00 2. Drew Kemp 5.32 3. Justin Sedgmen 7.69 4. Jake Allen 7.16 5. Lewis Kerr 8.60 6. Ashton Boughen 2.00 7. Max Perry 2.00 Comes to 44.77 vs Poole's current limit of 45.55.

"We will field our 2023 side with Leicester building a team based on start of season averages and we will be announcing details of their side shortly" That seems quite unfair on Leicester, at first glance, especially with Poole being at home. But I guess Leicester could pick 7 riders who's averages have gone up?

Newcastle certainly showed how difficult it was to get heat leaders riding on a Sunday, can't see Sunday's working for Champ speedway these days.

Of course the BSPL are going to recommend thru go into the Champ, hardly gonna recommend they close down or join Nora are they! Which begs the question, was the recommendation in the best interests of the club or the BSPL?

I've seen this comment many times & I'm not sure why? Cook was having a fantastic season, had upped his average and was out performing Pickering, until the incident against Poole, which I can only assume affected him badly. It's not like he never finishes a season, I'm sure it's the first time he's not finished a season (unless injured). Even so, teams use guests all the time, don't understand how that could be considered as negative

I think it was something like: 4* 3.50-6.50 3* 3.00-3.49 2* 2.50-2.99 1* 2.00-2.49 Something like that, I remember Flint (just below 3.5) being a lower grade than Bickley (just above 3.5). Very lopsided looking averages, as it was basically designed to allow Josh Bates to be a RS in the top division.

If the limit is 38 & teams should end up on 42 (on average) every rider should be looking to put 0.5 on their ave without even improving. But like you say, with some of their main rivals gone, anyone on 8+ averages could be looking at an even bigger increase.

I wouldn't have advised that - if the NL continues. Lots of very promising riders have struggled in their first Champ season... but if the Champ is weakened next season, he may not have than concern. Probably be irrelevant as the NL looks over (sadly).

I agree Poole are definitely favourites, but some suggested it was all over already, that's certainly not the case & who I would be arguing against.

If the NL disappears as seems to be the case, it will certainly cause issues for the Championship. In the past when a decent young Brit (4-5) point rider has missed out on a team, he's been able to sign for a NL side to keep "race fit" even if he'd normally be above NL level. So Champ teams would have replacements ready to jump in to cover injuries / poor form. Now it would be harder to anticipate a rider keeping his equipment "up to scratch" with no racing available. Similar thoughts about the 2.00 juniors who jump in to cover injuries to reserves (Luke Harrison for example) gonna be an awful big step from second half racing against fellow juniors to racing in the Champ!

Technically doesn't have to happen again, Scunny would settle for 44 points lol!

Totally agree, mega respect for riders aiming to move up in the sport & leave the Championship behind. It's only in the last 5/10 years, that the very top Champ riders have decided to stay & double up "forever".

I'm sure Poole will be the happier of the two teams, but this is far from over, given Scunthorpe drew at Poole in the play-offs.