szkocjasid

I think what he said was perfectly fair. When you make a daft prediction, people are quick to point it out, but rarely happens the other way. So naturally you'll want to pat yourself on the back. Nought wrong with that.

I'll go for: Belle Vue 44-46 Ipswich On paper Ipswich better than that, but 5-1s to Belle Vue in heats 13&15, plus an extra ride for Bewley or Kurtz will keep it closer. But not enough for a home win imo

I'll go for: Birmingham 40-50 King's Lynn

Can't see Belle Vue winning this at all, Belle Vue reserves having to take 11 rides between them against a very strong Ipswich reserve pairing, so even if Bewley & Kurtz go unbeaten, still fancy an Ipswich win.

Should be top 2 at 1+5, then rest of top 5 as they please imo.

He's got a better average than many Brits at reserve. Unfortunately for him, he's riding in a weak team that has lots of points to spare. There are weaker reserves still with team spots due to the points limit.

Cluff would be the next to go if they found a stronger rider imo.

It could simply be Plymouth think Klima is better than Trigger & he's the best rider willing to ride for them? Ideally they should've signed an 8.00 rider, putting Bowtell to reserve, but dropping a 3.5 rider for a 4.0 rider isn't pointless. I'm sure Plymouth will be hoping Klima is better than a 4.0 rider anyway.

No special allowance for Lynn, obviously the rules allow clubs to redeclare their RS every match of they so want to. So far only Lynn have done it. Lynn aren't using a facility to replace a rider quitting. Just signed a new rising star (which they keep swapping).

Duplicated

As a reward for winning the LCQ / finishing top scorer (or 2nd top). As the FIM want to winner to score the most, they'd probably want the finalists to score more than non finalists too. But there's no reason why 20-18-16 the heat results counting wouldn't work imo.

All brilliant points. The promoters should read this at the AGM.

My biggest issue is the points scoring, if a rider scores 12 points in the heats, why can't he keep those points? If 5 riders tied on 6 points why does one deserve 4 more points than someone who scored the same as him? Wether they have top 8 semi finals or top 10 LCQ's they could simply make the final scoring 20-18-17-16, everyone else gets the points scored during their 5 heats.

Totally agree, riders say you have you pay X amount because that's what bikes cost. But really it should be riders get paid based on how much income clubs get from the gates & sponsors. Clubs willing to run at a loss is bizarre to me. Riders won't like it, but as other have said they used to have to work & ride. Maybe it's best the Champ goes back to what it was like when Workington returned? You could say ideally the Champ is for riders who live & work over here. Prem riders can chase Poland etc.

Just read on the updates Sonny Springer is retiring. Big shame, he certainly had a lot of potential.

These parts make me question a lot of riders who race over here on a visa. Especially thinking how can a Championship second string or reserve be "significantly contributing to the development of speedway at the highest level in the UK" Hopefully the home office don't pay any more attention to Speedway than they already do.

With neither Poole or Oxford having a match on Wednesday, thought that would've been the perfect time for their BSN semi final! How often will both Wednesday clubs have a free Wednesday? Totally understand Oxford not hosting their leg as they were at home in the Prem yesterday, but why couldn't Poole host the first leg? Apart from waiting for Cairns to turn 16, which is a poor excuse for not racing imo. Can see all the finals being raced at the end of the season again, always thought it'd be better to have them spread out.

Did Redcar have a home match on 11th July? I thought they did but can't see anything on the SpeedwayGB website.

The next Friday both clubs are available is 5th September. Given that Glasgow have to arrange this match (both Friday clubs), arrange the ko cup tie with Edinburgh (both Friday clubs) and arrange the BSN semi final against Redcar (both Friday clubs), could end up still racing in late October! Well done to Glasgow for offering a Saturday date, they're probably the one club who willingly change race dates more than any other.

Gotcha, happens all the time in Speedway with injuries etc. It's gotten to the stage where I suggest clubs don't replace injured riders (Leicester)

The club isn't being punished (that's why a guest is allowed) the rider is.

The strongest Oxford have looked all season & possibly the weakest Birmingham have looked this season. Oxford should really be picking up their biggest win of the season.

If Sheffield are looking for a temp replacement for Flint, how about Luke Harrison? He is a Steelers rider after all. If Lynn want to keep him, go for Jody Scott instead? While Lynn might prefer to keep swapping their RS, a full-time (albeit temporary) role at Sheffield might suit one of them? When Flint comes back, Lynn could always go back to sharing? Other Steeler's they could give a shot to are Nathan Ablitt or Vinnie Foord?

I don't think clubs wanting to race on a night which brings in the best crowds is picky, just good business sense. If the rest of the league said Mon, Tue or Thurs only, don't think Ford would run next season. Would someone else take over Poole?

That was my thinking too, the Lynn top 5 were all solid, so I could see Kvech getting 5 rides, but not necessarily 7. If he was flying on the day maybe he'd get more. Lynn would've had a better chance of winning with Kvech, but I wouldn't say it was a guarantee.