Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

iris123

Members
  • Posts

    43,710
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    336

Everything posted by iris123

  1. You fail to convince me on any of your points.In fact most miss and you have to revert to the old old one of "He is risking his life for our entertainment.....".Face facts.Harris went out not to entertain,but to make the top 8 or better during his time in the GPs.Mostly he didn't make it,which not only in my opinion,but surely his,meant he failed to live up to his expectations.This makes him a failure and because he failed on a number of occasions means he is a serial failure whether you like it or not. Quite often i have not been entertained when going to meetings or watching them on tv/livestream which by your criteria means quite a lot of riders are failures.They do it to make money and don't think of me in the slightest. The scores i quoted which are fact are only irrelevant because you don't like them and don't fit what you are saying.As it was,the German Fedration came out and stated that the rules were broken by including Harris without first informing them that there was a vacancy and for them to supply quite rightly a rider for that vacancy.Now i don't know what you call not following or breaking a rule,but to me that is not lawful,i.e illegal.Ok this is speedway and we get used to rules being broken,but what word would you use to describe that then?As a German rider should have been in,instead of Harris those are the grounds,regardless of whether Smoli qualified.I think if we go back to the early rounds in which Harris got his entertaining 4 points at least one German other than Smolinski scored more and did qualify for the next round.Maybe he would have scored more again if he was in the Poole meeting?
  2. Nut is right,but i don't think her name is Shell lol
  3. Any idea of who is riding for each team?And will there be a few international riders in the league apart from i guess maybe Bunyan
  4. Of course it is unfair that Harris is the first reserve.More deserving candidates are out there and Harris is a serial failure who shouldn't have been anywhere near the meeting. Quite possibly the spot should have gone to a German rider who should have been in the meeting instead of him.As a late replacement he cozuld have completed in the meeting basically illegaly,but his points shouldn't have counted.Sure i remember rider competing in meetings,but not being in the actual competition...... As it is if we look at the GP qualis we have Harris (2 meetings) 4+10 which gives an average of 7 Batchelor (3 meetings) 12+3,9+2,9=10 Liglad (3) 12+3,11+3,7=10 Jonasson (3) 9,9,6=8 So all have a better average than Harris and all failed just the once.The thing is only Harris gets another chance after failing
  5. To paraphrase Meatloaf.....I took the words right out of his mouth
  6. Ach,yer just showing off now.......what with yer quotes and smilies pfffft
  7. Having fallen into the same trap,i suspect you are right.Just taking the p out of those who couldn't work around it lol
  8. Come on guys,spit it out.....don't be shy!!!! Personally i don't think the amount of tracks operating is sustainable with the amount of outgoings + the crowd sizes.It is kept by the benevolence of a few promoters/sponsors digging deep and a lot of volunteers giving up their time.
  9. Didn't Phil think he might get picked because he would add loads of people on the gate at places like Finland?If you think about it,he could have done all the Gps apart from Cardiff and added more people than Lindgren.He might have stood a good chance of getting in the top 8 without the need to do Cardiff and if he dropped out of that one at the last minute......well what do you know,Chris harris is just down the road with his bikes at the ready.Job done.Everyones happy
  10. Might be mistaken,but i thought there was one introduced fairly recently.I did see mention a few days ago that Russian born Loktaev who has turned Ukranian is now thinking of changing back to being a Russian,so maybe there isn't such a rule.Or maybe he is just going back to riding on a Russian licence......
  11. I would say it was strangely quiet amongst the Swedish friends of mine on facebook yesterday + today.Not one single comment,which maybe tells a tale in itself.
  12. You probably have better connections in the sport around the continent than me,but from what i have seen from Denmark/Germany and a certain Dutch guy most are disappointed/shocked/apalled at the inclusion of both Swedes.Almost every comment i have seen has echoed the Brits here and said, one would have sufficed.Apart from one Czech comment from a guy who is known as a Lindbäck fan,so i won't use him as an example,i haven't seen what anyone in Italy or Hungary or belgium have said on the situation
  13. I'd have to agree with Tsunami really.Going after people who left the sport when they were in their 20s or 30s is different to trying to get back fans who are in their 40s or 50s or even older.I stopped following the sport when the Dons closed in 1991 just before i was 30.If i stopped going now when just in my 50s there is probably not much chance i would make a big comeback.Now you are older and from some of your posts over the past few years have also lost a lot of enthusiasm with the sport.If you stopped now it is probably unlikely that in 5 or 10 years time you would come back and be such an active supporter
  14. Pity.Could have gone with a bit of a controversial "new" rider instead of the "same old same old" Jonsson + Lindgren.......
  15. Same at every track in the country i would think.Sure Ford said he lost 1,000s every time he opened the gates.If not him then most other promoters have said something similar
  16. Not surprised you are confused.You can't even remember what you put on here some minutes ago.No mention of just speedway.You make a general statement about "chosen sport",so i put some facts about "chosen sports".I chose boxing and running
  17. No they don't.The fact someone is the fastest runner in the world supports my view they are better than someone who has won a world championship.The fact there are 3 maybe 4 world boxing champs supports my opinion that a world champion isn't by definition the best.How can you have 3 or 4 people all different who are the best?Like i say,you are mixed up and confused
  18. You'd be wrong.Steve has also given an example and Egon Müller would be another.He was very good and at that track in Germany certainly amongst the sports elite,but no year ever was he the best rider in the world.........
  19. Not particularly.You can have a runner who has broken the world record but not the current world champ,I would say the world record holder is the best.You could also have 3 or 4 world champions at a particular sport.Boxing for example........Don't think world best always equals world champion
  20. They actually say they are carrying on as if nothing has happened,which is why they have announced wildcards.But of course both sides are readying for battle.Bellamy might say he has no input,but with the money his company are spending who is going to believe that?And One Sport aren't just going to go away after the deals they have put in place.Then again with the internal struggle within the FIM maybe it would please a certain faction if FIM Europe were taken to court?Ultimately though i think One Sport seem to have right on their side and there can be no stopping rival competitions,given the nature of the sport and how the riders sign multiple contracts
  21. Surely events over the past year put paid to any thoughts in the short term?
  22. In fairness i think it would be hard in most of the US sports to actually find a league table wouldn't it?I might be wrong but aren't they usually split up into different regional conferences and then the top teams from each play-off.A bit different imo,although i am no expert on American sport
  23. So does the GP series.Fact is,you pull someone up for using team sports and then to further your argument you yourself use a team sport example.One that is far from perfect and especially at the moment having chosen a team as host that have never qualified............So i'd say the GP series and its wildcard picks are superior to one or two of the seeds that FIFA have chosen or who EUFA might be planning on choosing
  24. Yes,maybe it is just a poor idea.It is though an idea.And it shows that football isn't above poor ideas either.You used football and the world cup as an example and then talk about how corrupt FIFA is..........
  25. I'm not really sure you are right on the first point.Tbh i can't recall many top riders not trying apart from Brits like Scott who was probably sure of getting picked even if he failed to make the cut in the GPs As for the second point i thought i read a proposal from Platini to hand pick some non European countries to play in the European Championship?!?! Those well known European countries like Brazil and japan were mentioned and i doubt they would be competing in the qualifiers or was that the idea?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy