mikebv

I remember that photo from Matej in his Manchester hotel room the night it was rumoured he wasn't going to make it.. Sent to social media about half ten at night.. Luckily we had a flood so the meeting got called off anyway.... Climate change hitting Gorton in isolation that night. Unlucky...

Would go to Brum to watch that team....

Driving around LA, with a prostitute, in a souped up Lambo, selling drugs and machine gunning all your drug pushing competition....

"We run the sport week in, week out, with Mickey Mouse, make it up as we go along rules, and no one complains, therefore, as always, there is absolutely nothing to see here, move along please, have you no homes to go to please. And if anyone thinks we don't have a clue what we are doing, explain how we increased the amount of opportunities for guests this year, see? eh?, visionary that, visionary, put that in your pipe and smoke it, keyboard warrior's"..... "Oh! And 7 day ban, to start from the next date when Ipswich don't have a meeting for the next 7 days"...

Ruined......

Will they be calling off meetings a day in front, like UK Spedway does? It is in Manchester, so maybe a week out?

Worth keeping him for tomorrow then... Doyle only four...

Who can Belle Vue bring in to make them stronger then?

House..(someone's)..

Max "too nice" Fricke... Could have ended Hampels race just by moving him wide... Instead let a 1-5 become a 3-3...

A couple of cracking races so far... You have to feel Gorzow could be getting a hiding tonight...

And then bring Robert Lambert in... (With Bomber guesting)...

Can Scott guest for him as well? Or maybe Bomber could? He must be due one?..

It is a risky pricing structure I would suggest.. Four matches being sold, with, I presume, three of them on live TV is a big ask to fill that stadium for every meeting... Especially with GB (senior team), only in the one meeting.. Maybe they have got it right though and there is great demand for their supply...

They gave them both the same finishing time.. Half past nine.....

He needs a very good night then... However... If he wasn't guesting and someone else did, Edinburgh could still get knocked out, and he would have missed out on three meetings... Plus.. Of course, if Berwick did reach the final, he could still get another couple of meetings riding for them... Or, he could ride for the other finalist if they needed him....... Don't think he could ride for both teams in the final, one leg each though...

And that is fair enough as he is self employed...

It doesn't... That takes planning...

In a ridiculously planned system...

Scott and Bomber had several blank dates in their calendar.....

I believe you either have a rehabilitation system, or you don't.. If Garrity's main way of earning money was as a plumber would he never be allowed to do it again.? Having employed ex cons, part of their release agreement can be restorative justice whereby they meet up with their victims and agree to give them recompense over time for their actions, and it is built into their wages received when they start work.. (Obviously this is led by the victim and doesn't always happen, but maybe in his case it has?).. To have anyone saying "I will never go again" though is crackers... If you have a flood at your home and are ankle deep in water, and an ex con turns up who you know has commited a violent crime, would you turn him away ? I am no bleeding heart liberal at all, but you either have a system that rehabilitate's and your slate is then clean when your time is served.. Or you don't...

100%... Guests don't have to be a "necessary evil" if some organisation and pro-activity was involved. Why don't the BSP sound out all the riders and list those willing to ride over here and use that for "emergencies" or team changes..? Some may only want a month some may want a whole season, it doesn't matter.. These "sub's on the bench" will replace guests, as and when required... Minimum 28 day contract so no "one off, horses for courses" ringers getting brought in (as happens now with guests), and using the average system (which they so slavishly do even though it is inherently flawed), would mean no one can manipulate the system (I know. I know!)... It would also mean competition for places and you could put a deadline for "no more changes" well before the play offs, meaning no "ringers" getting parachuted in (unless it is in the interest of Speedway obviously). I personally still think that, given the lack of riders of a "certain level", six rider teams would benefit (currently), the UK... eg there would be 7 riders in the current one to sixes that wouldn't have a place, but would be available to cover, (plus Scott obviously), if they chose to keep the RS and rode them at No6... Much better for the sports credibility and would mean a team place in the UK wasn't a given regardless of performance, which can happen..

Indeed... Again, not condoning what he did, but a sport that has allowed competitors to fix races shouldn't throw too many stones..

They retired and vacated the crown.. Laguta hasn't done either....

Another one tomorrow for the other meetings?