MD

Absolutely and there is little value in his average for Edinburgh to retain him. Riss on the other hand has plenty to come.

The 3 riders at the bottom will be cannon fodder and sacrificed at every opportunity if that is Glasgows top four. Hopefully Ayres can make a bit of progress as i can see him being joined with a 3 point journeyman at reserve.

Masters applied for another Visa to ride in the EL why couldnt Sedgmen. He's been well sheltered riding at No2 without much pressure and has come up with a 4 week spell where he was outstanding. I wouldnt rely on him being an out and out heat leader, he's great when things are going well but when there not ...... As for putting another point on his average, do me a favour.

Worky would have been better retaining Wethers. He didnt start until June and was coming good in the latter meetings. He will improve on his sub 5 average whereas Campton has achieved his level and is off the back of a year without competitive speedway.

Its not happening, not in the interests of Scottish speedway.

Wouldnt you just love that but outside the EH postcode area i dont think so.

Reading some of the press stuff today Stewart Dickson says he is going to bring more racers to GLA. Next announcement is Friday. Im interested to know who our No7 will be.

Sure but he was frustrating as well with his starting technique which lost us more points than gained over the season. He's another that could progress with the right influence and guidance, not Havelock who can barely string a coherent sentence together.

In reality Sarjeant only showed anything when the season was drawing to a close. Yes he did get us a decent result at Somerset but struggled in the main body otherwise and doesnt offer value on his current average. I havent mentioned the starting issue either!

A decent rider that with the right guidance can become much better. A season or 2 in Sweden to develop will do him good. I would be loathe to loan him out in Britain as he is on an average we could benefit from should he improve in that time.

You could always ask for a reduced average based on that 😉! #preciousjoe

No mention of Voldrich. He seemed ok before he was injured.

No we should not, an absolutely stunning piece of arrogance. Your promotion kept Edinburgh running, they moved out after a year and Glasgow returned the following season. You dont need to be a top rider to be in Poland. Worrall S, Vissing, King, Anders Thomsen etc all ride there. By moving away from a Sunday it increases the number of available riders to choose from and with Scunthorpe vacating a Friday its shooty in. Wonder if Scunthorpes change of race day requires to be voted on. #justasking

The timing of the letter was as good as it could have been. Glasgow could have handed it out at the beginning of the meeting or even printed it in the match programme. It was after all our last time at Ashfield until March. The only other alternative was to publish it on the club website at some point. The nature of the letter or more appropriately information leaflet being printed and not being in the programme suggests that it all unfolded immediately before Fridays meeting. Perhaps an agreement had been reached that was then reneged on. The tone of the letter suggests frustration with the whole situation. I doubt anyone would resort to putting it in the public domain at the first instance of difficulty. The other side of this is that Edinburgh have the right to reply. They are not slow in coming forward when they perceive they have been wronged or another party has not acted with the integrity they see themselves as having. To date they have made no comment. That may be due to the promoters AGM taking place or that the directors have yet to discuss this latest situation, or just maybe the Glasgow information leaflet hit the nail on the head and no one is available for comment. Imagine the Edinburgh PRO remaining silent!

Would be good to park Victor for a year and let him develop in Sweden. He's on an ok average to bring back should he improve. I wouldnt let him sign elsewhere for the meantime. Was interesting to read in the programme that Aaron has interest from EL clubs and from Sweden where he was a squad member this year. Im sure he will sign for us though the uncertainty over our race night may hinder him elsewhere.

The venomous atmosphere was present on Friday night, something i havent seen since the early to mid 2000's. For the first time i chose to move away from the fourth bend enclosure to escape it. Banter is banter but the anti Glasgow theme was prevalent throughout. Perhaps they get excited travelling beyond Harthill, for others it was drink. Regardless its off putting.

Glasgow contributed to it by having a ridiculous number of tapes exclusions in the opening heats at Le Stade D'Ashfield which showed we were nervous even though under no pressure. Nick never came to the party until his last 2 heats and we missed Summers big style. Ive no doubt Aaron would have won his second heat against Wolbert and Riss had he not hit the tapes.

Anyway back to the meeting and Glasgow were their own worst enemy with a ridiculous number of tapes exclusions in the opening half of the meeting. Sarjeant led the charge at reserve consistently outscoring his opposite number at reserve and we need more of the same tonight. I've not made up my mind if Carr improves or seriously improves the Monarchs at reserve. A tough battle ahead. Hopefully Theo can do us a turn though r/r for Summers may not be ideal with Morris taking 3 rides to get going. I'll be glued to the updates heat by heat, would be a bonus if someone could provide less subjective analysis via the Speedway Updates site.

Its taken the new owners less than 12 months to get their measure. Now they know what they are dealing with. They will have learned cooperation only happens when it suits. Times are changing, the establishment are being challenged and its our turn to be successful.

Glasgow have been to court before in the early 2000's and won due to a rule that wasnt applied and which disadvantaged Glasgow. Then owner Brian Sands was subsequently driven out.

Absolutely agree, with current arrangements it extends Edinburghs sphere of influence far wider than it should be. Edinburghs franchise should be reduced to a radius of 15 or 20 miles from Edinburgh city centre and Glasgow likewise. As it is Armadale is almost on the border of North Lanarkshire and that should be the farthest point considered east.

The answer is no but thats just the smokescreen, its more likely that Glasgow and Edinburgh will be competing for an ever decreasing number of riders for Friday nights and with the way things are going Glasgow may have more financial clout moving forward. Going back to a previous point the club owners have said the club must cover revenue expenditure from gate receipts whilst they are happy for the moment to spend on capital items in and around the stadium. It feels like the tide is turning and we are going to have our time once again and step out from the shadows of Edinburgh, a bit like the beginning of the Shawfield era. The bitterness then from our rivals was significant with accusations of oversized engines and all sorts. Those people are still involved with them today and dont expect them to take it lying down.

Which part? Thanks were given all round and they made it clear they wont be bullied by anyone. It was very clear who that was referring to. Im not sure that alone would drive your comments.

The letter handed out isnt particularly controversial. Its Edinburghs right to object to Glasgows request which they have exercised. Its a no brainer for Glasgow wanting to move to a Friday as it doesnt compete with other sports like football as it does on a Sunday and there are no foreign speedway leagues running that night either. Glasgows owners clearly feel frustrated by it all and wont attend Armadale any more. Thats no great issue. However we need to dispel the myth Scottish speedway. There is no such thing, there is Glasgow speedway and there is Edinburgh speedway. For the 3 seasons prior to this one Glasgow could have gone to the wall and no one in the east would have batted an eyelid. The other myth is that there is cross over of fans attending each others tracks. Absolute nonsense! Outwith when the teams meet this just doesnt happen. For years there has been a mutual boycott among many of attending each others track which has only changed this year with the relaunch of Glasgow. Im not sure it is capable of lasting in the long term and no doubt this statement will deter a few more.

Still no write down of the Monarchs chances from TheScotsman. Thats confidence for you!