Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

noaksey

Members
  • Posts

    1,028
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by noaksey

  1. I think depending on team building and admission prices Oxford should make a decent fist of the Premiership. I can't see the championship being well supported though. So people have the money now to go to a meeting once per week which presumably Oxford will be as presumably they'll go for alternate weeks, if they run 2 meetings in the same week that would be madness
  2. CVS said ages ago the shale was piled up on the car park and he'd got an agreement that the speedway equipment can be stored on site for up to 12 months
  3. Presumably the Showground have asked for the track and fence to be removed within a certain time frame. Wolves have removed theirs albeit can store stuff at the stadium for 12 months
  4. He'll remain suspended until the fine is paid. Somebody (I can't remember who, a Reading rider maybe) from years ago never paid his and never rode again
  5. Tolley's last update (in last week's speedway star) said he hadn't heard from the stadium Until he does there's nothing to say, he can't force them to arrange a meeting
  6. Only Belle Vue ride home matches on a Monday now so presumably that wouldn't work
  7. It's a bit Bomber Harris here's an announcement about an announcement Certainly got a few worked up anyway
  8. I wouldn't automatically assume CVS will accept. Be interesting to see what happens if a site is found
  9. It could be that a deal has been finalised with Chapman I guess
  10. Presumably Oxford physically can't run on Thursdays but Poole can if they choose to?
  11. They won't be able to give any commitment without a written agreement from the stadium I'd imagine as there'd be financial implications if they subsequently withdraw The major issue with waiting is that they can't build a team and anyone decent will have signed elsewhere, he mentions this as a concern in the Star
  12. The article says they've been told they have to declare by then so presumably they'll stick to that. Late declaration would be no good to Brum either as anyone decent would be signed up already by other teams and Brum have been in that boat before
  13. That makes sense, fingers crossed it's a runner
  14. Tolley in the Star has heard nothing from the stadium and admits time is running out now as Brum have to declare at the AGM which is now less than a week away
  15. Yes most of the derelict industrial sites are between Monmore and the railway station with virtually zero housing to worry about. Who owns them is another question altogether, it's probably not Wolverhampton Council that's for sure. Presumably a commercially owned site is unlikely to be affordable for Wolves unless it's offered on reduced terms
  16. I'd imagine that the issue is that the testing has to be carried out by a company that is accredited to one of the doping agencies (whichever one speedway uses or decides to use) so that's probably charged out at commercial rates rather than being able to use the track doc/Bert on the pit gate etc Your suggestion is much better than testing every single rider in every meeting but I'd say random testing at every meeting is probably still out of reach cost wise but certainly worth the BSPL investigating
  17. 1 person to test 14 riders? That'd be fun, you keeping them in a locked room? You'd need several people all accredited drug testers then the ability to log and deal with all the samples. Multiply that by every single meeting held in the UK and it's a huge expense
  18. Having multiple testers at every single meeting staged in the UK would be a huge commitment by the sport. This would be administered by a 3rd party agency as presumably it is now but the costs would be eye watering. You could attempt to place a levy on riders contracts but I'm not sure that would stand up, is there any other professional sport that requires it's participants to pay for testing at every event?
  19. If something is in South Staffs then how could it be "jointly with Wolverhampton" unless the site borders both South Staffs AFAIK has never had a speedway track and it must be doubtful if they'd be in favour
  20. There's no reason whatsoever the consortium would buy assets unless there's some prospect of speedway somewhere in the next couple of years. Presumably Chapman will allow them to make initial enquiries on behalf of Peterborough speedway to land owners without payment for the Rights/Licence with a detailed agreement in place if they find something
  21. Good summary, the speed of the planning for Dunstall is remarkable They could conceivably start building today provided there are no relevant reserved matters
  22. I think it's probably more a case of the consortium not sure of what they are buying. They could end up paying money for something which never trades again and has no resale value. As you say there's a complicated nominal payment now with multiple overage clauses within certain time frames agreement to be done but very difficult to negotiate
  23. They've paid £40m for the site? They must have some serious plans for it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy