noaksey

Me too. A strange decision

I'm scratching my head a bit about Wolves strategy here. We didn't have enough race winners last year particularly in away matches and in key heat 13/15's. Masters and Worrall are likely to average the same, Schlein might match Morris's figure so any improvement has to come from Becker and Douglas and the no 6. Flint might be a bit better also. If Sedgmen doesn't fit and Cook goes to Peterborough there doesn't appear to me to be much to pick from. Could be a repeat of last year at worst.

Apart from the fact that CVS has said he'll never book Barker over his non appearance at Wolves for a Birmingham fixture. Sedgy looks favourite.

What is the criteria?

Agree on Sedgy I'll be pleasantly surprised if Rory averages more than 6 so overall we will have lost half a point from Mozza. Masters and Worrall should be the same so improvement has to come particularly from Becker and Duggo plus better no 6 and we can expect a bit more from Flint. If all that happens we might challenge Sheffield etc

If Worrall 6.12 signs then 4.49

It's not correct. We would be half a point over with Andersen

£22 adult race night admission at Sheffield Gulp

Yes agreed. On balance I'd keep Morris rather than go back to Rory. Don't think we will though

If we sign Schlein and Worrall I believe that leaves 4.49, Andersen is 4.93

He won't get in anyone's 1-5 though

If we sign Rory and Worrall then Andersen/Craig Cook won't fit Sedgmen at 6 if we do?

So if we sign Schlein and Worrall then none of the experienced options for no 6 will fit.

What Ave is Craig Cook?

7.14 I think. Does he qualify for a 2.5% reduction Be interesting to know for definite if Nicholls fits if Schlein and Worrall are the other 2

One of the two remaining Cooks then.....

It'll be Wolves who will Cook up a no 6 instead of Nicholls

I'm hearing it's definitely a Cook....I'm surprised it's not Nicholls if he fits

Schlein in for Morris makes the team weaker in all probability. So the improvement has to come from Becker and Douglas and our new no 6.

Makes sense that. Thank you

That's a fair point but must be balanced against presumably having to have 24 hour security on site to prevent further issues.

The legal costs are substantial and certainly move things on substantially from the 10k fine. What actual permission if any would BE require to demolish everything that remains to avoid further "security" issues arising? That would surely be their logical next move

He's not fantastic at Monmore either but the promotion seem to like him from what I've heard

About Peterborough or about coming back all together?

Very difficult, Belle Vue and Sheff had good heat leaders and look like doing so again, Wolves don't, I think we need an 8 pointer to back up Sam but genuinely can't think of anyone, all of the potentially available riders are 6 pointers, 7 at most. Maybe they think Becker will step up. A good number 6 will help but if its Nicholls or Andersen that might not make a huge difference in away matches