NeilWatson

Ulrich will not be riding at Redcar on Thursday.

Peterborough do have two ambulances in attendance, however it is a medical decision whether to call and transfer to a County ambulance. Cost does not enter the equation where our medical cover is concerned.

Thanks. The options are a PL only rider of 5.7 or below, a CL rider of 7.41 or below, or RR. Rule out all the riders already racing and go from there.

Average too high

Yes Not the case Yes, but the top three in the averages, not necessarily the heatleaders on the night.

Yes if their average fits - 5.7 or lower

As are Ipswich, Edinburgh, Sheffield and Glasgow

Kings Lynn are riding on Thursday (at Swindon)

It does except for guest replacement for the home No 1 Yes

That’s the route I’d use too - but I thought the main road route might be easier for anyone who doesn’t know the road! The traffic issues didn’t seem to keep too many people away from what was an excellent meeting.

To Cambridge, possibly Whittlesey, March, Huntingdon, St Ives?

Highways Agency website not much help. From Newmarket I would travel via Ely, March and Whittlesey - miss out the A14/A1 completely.

That's not correct. It's simply an astute signing within the rules (Art 19.7).

If anyone is interested in what I've put together showing how the Peterborough team changes this season were calculated please email me at neil@peterboroughpanthers.co

Scott 7.74 Ulrich 7.41 Michael 6.68 Bradley 5.90 Emil 5.04 Simon 4.80 Tom 3.03 Team total 40.60 so 6.94 is the figure

Because there are two different ‘kinds’ of green sheets - immediate changes where there is a team change, a rider gains an established CMA rather than assessed etc, and the monthly revised averages which are issued based on historic data. It is complex, especially when there’s a mixture of rolling and assessed averages and team changes over the month-end. I’ll come back to this later and try and illustrate how Panthers recent changes were arrived at.

New averages were issued on 1st June (based on meetings up to 23rd May) which changed the team total and hence the scope for team changes. Sorry :-)

A guest facility wouldn’t be available as Kennett is not in the top three of the Club averages - RR only to replace him.

Not really strange, it’s the most recent average - that could be quite a while ago if injury or seasons away from the UK are taken into account.

This is nothing new :

‘To be correct’, Rider A remains in a declared 1-7 until replaced by Rider B - there is never an ‘empty place’ in a 1-7

A rider uses his most recent average, which in this case would be a converted CL average attained in 2018 rather than a 2017 average.

If we follow that path we will be ‘reverting’ not ‘redeclaring’ which is quite legitimate and doesn’t have the restrictions you suggest. Should Emil have already appeared in another 1-7 the option to revert would simply have not been available.

That’s not correct, Pijper was not in the Redcar 1-7 once he was replaced by THJ - hence why he was free to be declared elsewhere.

Agreed, my point was that Pijper was already declared elsewhere, so Redcar couldn’t revert had they wished to. Their use of an NDL guest WAS a facility (albeit the no-facility facility) - no other facility was available as Jorgensen hadn’t completed a meeting.