Daniel Smith

You've misinterpreted Chris. He's called Louis a disgrace for defending Chapman . There are no quotes in the post

He didn't save Peterborough. He bought it to save the Premiership & it's TV deal

That's correct, Louis no longer owns the stadium do they? I think Speedworth bought that? As a new owner, you're probably just purchasing the bond, licence, assets then may be £20k for the name. £50-£70k all in

A serious businessman looking for a tax break on other businesses

What's all this nonsense to stick in an honours list?

Not forgetting, he was also after Ipswich too purely to save the league & TV deal. Fortunately for Ipswich, Tru Plant got involved

That wasn't the situation at all. The issue was, at that time, had Peterborough moved down the Premiership would have been disbanded & the BSPL would have lost the Discovery TV deal. Buster bought Peterborough for that reason only, not to save the club & has shown total disregard for the club ever since. It's just ticking over & got absolutely jammy with it's league title thanks to covid, with every other teams having to run a bargain basement line-ups.

Curveball: reason for postponement somebody may not have been available for Monday & it's crucial King's Lynn win vs Peterborough? Can we genuinely trust a King’s Lynn press release these days?

So, to be clear here. Regardless of what's on offer everyone should rock up a support the team?

Do you not see the problem with that?

This King's Lynn side would batter 'top of the table' Oxford so I'm not sure it's right to call it a mid table Championship side. The 1-3-5 is closer but Oxford would be dominated at 2-4-6-7 positions 1. Sam Masters vs Artem Laguta 2. Henry Atkins vs Kye Thomson 3. Lewis Kerr vs Michael Palm-Toft 4. Jordan Jenkins vs Thomas Jorgensen 5. Scott Nicholls vs Nicolai Klindt 6. Cameron Heeps vs Simon Lambert 7. Ryan Kinsley vs Anders Rowe

Think that's were the confusion is, Buster thought they where 2 Ekstraliga juniors & wouldn't sign off the chitty

I've got to be honest, I think that press release is an absolute disgrace. It's a clear effort to not put any blame on to Buster & or Allitt. People have missed the point in that King's Lynn (& Peterborough) have been run disgracefully even pre Brady & the common denominator in that is the 2 names within my 2nd paragraph. It's not a coincidence

I'm simply saying that's not something you can throw at King's Lynn fans, we're used to not winning. There are far greater circumstances to people not attending, not winning isn't a major factor.

In the top flight King's Lynn & glory hunting isn't something that can be thrown at King's Lynn fans ever. Many on here have been fans for more than 30yrs & success isn't what is demanded. What is demanded though in 2023 is VFM. There's not 1 thing currently about King's Lynn (& Peterborough) that give anything back to the fans. Poor track, poor racing, poor team, poor food etc. Why should us not going feel guilty if the club closes?? I've always said it, I'll say it again & it's absolutely, without question, fact: IT'S NEVER THE FANS FAULT IF A CLUB CLOSES. It's on those running the clubs

Sorry to all the fans that continue to hold on to that passion to still attend meetings while British Speedway continues to shoot itself in the foot.

I've already stated, Sedgmen went back to the pits because of the fall which allows all rider's to return. Tarasenko got lucky, had Sedgmen not needed to go back to the pits Tarasenko would have been excluded.

Correct, it was stopped because a rider fell & the rider at fault from the tapes gained an advantage. The referee chose the unsatisfactory start option & called all four back. It's not hard to grasp, it is an option to the referee's.

This

It makes evwry sense

It was so your point is irrelevant. We'll never know but had the rider not fallen the referee may have continued the heat.

Anyone willing to share what Simon Lambert's "telling it like it is" was or are we going through the "I know something you don't know?"

Yes, all down to whether the referee deemed someone had gained an advantage. Even if a rider rolls or anticipates the start but comes out 4th, they will still be deemed as "gaining an advantage" if another rider falls. It's all referees discretion

For an unsatisfactory start Sedgmen wouldn't be excluded for falling. If Sedgmen had to return to the pits because of the fall, the remaining 3 riders can also return to the pits.

Didn't think you could leave the track for an unsatisfactory start? I assume that's what iainb's asking which should have resulted in Tarasenko being excluded.