Daniel Smith

It was a fair question. Members of a disciplinary panel shouldn't be existing promoters / owners of clubs as they can be accused on the basis of not being impartial

I don't have any ice cream :cry:

undecided, with the sun beaming may go for salad

It's not complicated. The U21 is a reserve for injured or ill riders. Absolutely on both points

FMNs can nominate a U21 Rider that is the same nationality as FMNs for each event. This rider is allowed to practice and will only race in the case of Injury or illness (supported by CMO) to a rider 1-4 from his FMN. Once the U21 rider has replaced a rider in 1-4 he will then complete the meeting taking the rides of the replaced rider. In no circumstances will the replaced 1-4 rider be allowed back in the meeting. The nomination and use of an U21 rider is not compulsory. The nominated rider will assume the position in the team of the injured rider. The injured rider and reserve replacement will jointly be entitled to race a maximum of 5 heats (4 Programmed heats and 1 nomination in heat 17-20) plus one additional heat as a Tactical Substitute or Tactical Joker. If replacing the injured rider in the rerun of a heat, the nominated rider will also assume the status of the injured (ie. programmed ride, Joker, or Tactical Substitute).

JC only asked a question about having club members on the board. Hardly venting

So, in your opinion Lambert will not be in the main GB Team. That's just your opinion. My 5 at the moment Woffinden Nicholls Cook Lambert Bates The reason foe leaving out Harris is the fact he's just racing for Coventry & being rubbish in the SGP's.

No, what's happening here is robert72 is right and you can't accept it. You know you're wrong so resort to the typical calling everyone else idiots He does my head in with his anti Woffinden posts but in terms of how he picked his SWC team Bates isn't the replacement. Harris or Cook or Nicholls or Lambert are Woffinden's replacements. Bates is just simply filling the U21 spot. Does it kill you that much to know robert72 is right??

Can't guarantee though that Lambert won't be in the main 4 for the SWC. If he does then Bates may well be the U21. Again, Bates hasn't replaced Woffinden because Robert72 has selected him as the U21 reserve which Woffinden can't be

Actually, to be fair to robert72 he hasn't got Bates as Woffinden's replacement. Woffinden's replacements are actually either of the top 4 riders in the list. SWC team consist of just 4 man teams with, as Robert said an U21 reserve i.e. Josh Bates. Chris Harris Craig Cook Scott Nicholls Robert Lambert Josh Bates

The report is still on the SCB website but I definitely can no longer find it in the BSPA website or Twitter feed which is where the news broke from.

Interestingly, It looks like the SCB statement regarding Hemsley has been removed from the SpeedwayGB website & the Twitter feed?!?!

As do I. Absolutely miss the PL at King's Lynn

Proof if any with a couple of the Swedish & Polish meetings recently that the big names DO NOT make Speedway interesting.

Maybe, but not under the circumstances anyone wanted. A genuine that to the closure of 3 clubs at the end of the same season. Disaster IMO

Is the security of the Elite League genuinely under threat. Coventry & Swindon's situations look bleak for their whole future's and now the shinanigans at Leicester. Are we at the end of the Elite League? I believe so

The fine is steep but the question remains, was it harsh? We'll never know until the facts come out. Will that ever happen? Not likely We hear quite a lot that he and his Mrs are lose cannons with their mouths. Even at their own rider's. SCB won't issue fines like that for nothing though

was it a female referee at the King's Lynn meeting? What he said could fall in the same category as the Eva Carneiro v Jose Mourinho court battle

Steep fine, totalling over £9K A fine of £7500 in addition to the £300 fine imposed at the Meeting. Costs of the Court Hearing £1380 saying that, if he fails to pay and it actually ends up in a real court and the rulings are upheld Hemsley could find himself in deeper stuff Art 3.2.5 (Ungentlemanly Conduct) x 2 counts Art 3.2 9 (fraudulent comments) x 2counts Art 3.2.8 (an act of violent, threatening and abusive behaviour) x 2 counts Art 3.2.7 (acts prejudicial to the interests of the sport) x 1 count Those last three would be interesting to know about what actually happened

Food Sorry

Interesting, expensive??

Chicken burger, much more up market than mine. Just has beans & sausages cold, straight out the tin. That's classy We'll get this thread back on track see What's that??

Come on SL, just start adding to the debate and it may get back on track. I'll help What are you having for tea tonight?

Put it better than me That last day of the final AGM was the 3rd November. That was day he was promoted to chairman. Not before

You put he was chairman BEFORE the AGM. It's does not say that at all before you start going of on one He was voted in on the last day, that is fact.