Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Daniel Smith

Members
  • Posts

    8,753
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by Daniel Smith

  1. Us Stars fans said the same last season & again this & probably again next. No 'feel good' factor around at the moment
  2. Thing is, it's about my team. If Harris scores less than 10 I certainly won't appreciates him taking the booking or my club for asking him. R/R would have probably been good for 7-8 anyway.
  3. Harris obviously doesn't see it as an excuse like you keep making for his poor performances
  4. You're joking right? No better time to come for Swindon. Huckenbeck is good for a 0 & Harris & Schlein with around 5 or 6 each.
  5. http://www.kingslynnstars.co/news.php?extend.30261 A much s#!+er 7 than I was expecting. What a joke
  6. Not sure Nicholls would be a good choice as guest as he has quite a nasty looking am injury from grass tracking at the weekend No doubt that the club are on the ball they'll run with R/R for Lambert giving Iversen everyone in the top 4 an extra ride. Kerr maybe the guest for Rose Possible line-up 1. Iversen 2. Starke 3. R/R 4. Schlein 5. Batchelor 6. Jakobsen 7. Kerr
  7. Just my 2p Maybe Tai's aim is for GB to fail to qualify for the race-off in 2017 which means they'd have to race in a World Cup qualifiers in 2018. This would show how far British Speedway has fallen. Woffy's performance in this years World Cup created a smoke screen.
  8. There you go again with your lack of knowledge thinking King's Lynn fans problems were getting beat by Poole. You really do know nothing outside of Dorset
  9. All the work Vatcher does most of us fans are completely oblivious to. That could only be the fault of the BSPA. Most of us believe GB doesn't have much of a future as everything seems to be a secret behind the scenes. That's no good thing as that also means potential fans and sponsors are unaware and then hinders progress. The only junior I'm currently aware of is Kyle Bickley, pretty sure he's not racing on his own though. The junior scene needs backing by more than one man & his wife.
  10. Must make you feel proud though that ya boy is getting talked about, shows he's doing something right even if some are being negative. You're right though, just why do foreign riders pick up the bigger sponsorship packages in British Speedway?
  11. I don't like him myself but there's nothing wrong with a rider having a bit of a 'Fear Factor' around him. Pedersen and Kildermand have done quite well from it.
  12. We'll go round in circles here. I don't need to highlight rules you're already stating. On Wednesday & Thursday Huckenbeck was declared under the 3 day team notification rule as a No2. Under the regulations if a No2 is suspended by his federation is a facility granted? Yes, so were is the issue?
  13. Have I? Just for clarification, were is the rule that says you can have a facility for a doubling up rider? Just for clarification, were is the rule that says you can have a facility for the 3rd reserve No9? They're not there because rules are based around the team notification of the 1-7 3 days prior to any meeting. There's no such thing as a double up, No8 or No9 rider in the team notification process. 1. Percy Pants 2. No8 3. Double Upper 4. Double Upper 5. Nora Knickers 6. EDR No6 7. EDR No9 The above is the team nomination 3 days prior to the meeting. That is a declared 1-7. If any of those become suspended within the 3 days prior a facility is granted. If any of those become suspended within the 3 days prior to the meeting you can't just reintroduce Peter Pervertson who's your No1 as a teams riding order isn't allowed to be reshuffled. Those are clear rules
  14. Yes you can. Once the teams are registered with the SCB 3 days prior to the meeting the No8 becomes a member of the 1-7, not a No8 Huckenbeck was suspended by the German authority so as King's Lynn's meeting No2 R/R is permitted
  15. Agree, my agreement with Shovvy's post was purely on the Harris comparison.
  16. Jesus, There's no need to redeclare as the No8 can replace any 1-5 at any time The facility for Huckenbeck was granted because he was declared in the meetings starting 7 but suspended by his German authority.
  17. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH R/R wasn't for Niels or that would of had to of been taken at No1-3-5. R/R was for Huckenbeck who was already declared in the teams 4-5 days prior but got suspended on the day / 24 hrs prior to the meetings by his German authority. Morley was in for Simon Lambert
  18. Nope Teams have to be notified 4-5 days prior to the meeting. Huckenbeck was in for Iversen as a No8 can replace 1-5 rider Huckenbeck then gets suspended on the day of the Poole meeting What exactly are Lynn to do? Iversen wouldn't have been allowed into the meeting even if he wanted to as that is against meeting notification regulations. The facility given for Huckenbeck is under rule 16.5.1.F. has been suspended by the FIM, ACU, SCB or rider’s FMN. Nope, Morley was in for Simon Lambert
  19. No argument from me of that assessment. I've said exactly the same from day one with the Lambert Harris comparison, it's scarily similar.
  20. And I'd argue that that was great for Lewis Rose to be against a rider of that calibre. The draft riders need more of it not less to improve, it's no good being up against like for like all the time.
  21. Kylmokorpi isn't an option. We'd have to replace 3 from Iversen, Lambert, Batchelor, Schlein & Jakobsen & lose nearly 2 points off our team averages to redeclare.
  22. Can't believe you've risked your life at Pizza Hut. That's more brave than the driving
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy