BWitcher

We are discussing a pts system. Kindly explain why the pts system used in speedway 'adds to' a circus side show image? And why pts systems in other sports are deemed acceptable?

I take your point, but it isn't like substitutes in other sports at all, mainly as only the losing team can do it and the difference is quite vast. You could say it's a bit like in a cricket match a side struggling 7 or 8 wickets down and they can then bring in their best batsmen again instead of the no 9. Also, riders aren't simply 'gifted' double pts, they have to beat riders to get them.. but as I said, I understand where you're coming from. As has been said many times before, in terms of 'fairness' the current tactical system is the fairest the sport has had. Like many others though, I do prefer the old tac subs..

No it doesn't. Does Rugby have a 'circus side show' image? How about cricket? Didn't think so. Next we'll hear the story of how when I told my mate the scoring system he burst out laughing.

Completely agree that the points system is one of the best things the sport has brought in. I've heard the same story regarding the 2pts, 3pts home issue and to be honest, its just promoters looking for excuses instead of embracing the real reasons why crowds are down. Generally it will be some numpty who doesn't understand having a whinge... but they are the type who are there every week anyway. Folks not coming if the team is losing every week I can understand, but I really can't see many, if any at all not coming because their team only got 2pts instead of 3 in a match they won.

Hopefully nothing serious, but Sudden Sam is ready for a fast track berth.

Likely a OneSport lackey.. the kind of which have gone very quiet of late...

It was all that was needed as track conditions were completely different last night to the league meeting. You see that guy in your profile pic? He has lived in the UK most of his life. How dare he ever have pulled on the USA race jacket. Be foolish to have him in your team now..

No.

Totally agree regarding King, Lambert needs to be in the team though so one of Worrall/Nicholls should be left out of the dry track team.

Yep.. fantastic racing, GP after GP from the worlds best riders. Who'd want that.. you're right to be bored. Same old riders? Yep.. Woffinden has been in it for years.. as has Zmarzlik.. Pawlicki, Doyle. 70's must have been awful, bet folk got sick of Olsen, Mauger etc

I'm assuming you were trying to have another little dig at Hancock there.. and failed miserably with your double negative that has actually praised his interviews.

Not at all... that is the 'main' demographic, not the only one. Dad dancing at a pool party to Little Mix is not a 3 x World Speedway Champion in contention for a fourth though is he. This forum is getting more bitter and jealous on a daily basis. Let's get this straight, the only one laughing in this situation is Hancock, all the way to the bank.

Monster's main market share is in the 27-37 age bracket, which isn't as far off from Hancock as some on here would have you believe.

Really? Show me the weeks Woffinden will be riding three times in Poland and twice in Sweden.

Good to see all the marketing experts out in force on this thread. Nothing to do with either their dislike of Hancock or their vendetta's against the GP of course.

Well if you haven't noticed it in almost ten years of racing then it's hardly likely you would have. His team riding has been on display countless times in tv meetings and has been discussed on this forum as far back as his Rye House days.

You've clearly never watched Woffinden ride much then as he is a brilliant team rider and has been doing it from a very young age.

I don't need to trip you up, you're doing a fine job of that yourself. You cannot give any form of opinion as to whether the sport is exciting now if you don't watch it. It is plainly ridiculous to even attempt to do so. I am far from a protector of the sport and criticise it and the promoters a lot. However, I watch the sport, attend when I can and as such can comment on both the good and the bad. What you saw years ago has absolutely zero relevance to the sport now. Your own local track, Belle Vue has a fantastic new stadium and a track that has been producing thrilling racing that ANYONE with even the slightest interest in speedway would find entertaining. You however, because you feel that you should not have to pay to get in, do not attend said track and continue to fire your barbed comments from home with your curtains drawn. Should you go along to the new stadium and don't find it entertaining your opinion would have some validity. As it is, you're just moaning for moaning's sake.

Lmao! Now this is getting hilarious. So, a sport you don't attend. A sport that you don't even watch on TV, when you are subscribed to the channel it is on. A sport who you would close the curtains to if it was in your own backyard.. Yet you subscribe to a magazine about the sport??

No, that's the good Rob Homer.

They have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

If a rider doesn't want the honour of riding for the British team, he shouldn't be allowed the individual honour of riding in the British Final... something that is far more logical than your argument, but the same principles. Yet not a peep from you about Scott Nicholls. Which essentially reveals to us, it's nothing to do with any of the reasons you keep putting forward, it's solely to do with you don't like Tai.

Robert72 makes a habit of this as anyone reading the "Should Tai Woffinden be selected for GB" thread would know. On there one of his claims is that Woffinden would be paid far more than other riders for racing in the British Final for example.. he knows because 'he rode a bike' in the past. He's also claimed to know the exact pay deals of several top riders, junior riders and others... all un-named of course. All of it is made up just so he can have a pop at someone, Woffinden on the other thread... Darcy Ward on this one. Anyway, as to the topic I think the following solution would be great. All riders get free entry, unless their name is Rob Homer.

Yeah right.. A great speedway race is a great speedway race. You enjoy it or you don't. You have zero idea about the quality in the sport at the moment, whether good or bad as you have admitted you don't attend, you don't even watch on TV and would draw the curtain if it was in your backyard. I stand by what I said, you have to be a very strange person to frequent a forum regarding something you have zero interest in. Unless of course it's all rubbish and you do still watch but that wouldn't gain you as much attention.

Why the hell would you be posting on a forum about something you don't go to, you don't watch and you don't enjoy. Some very strange folk about.