Humphrey Appleby

It would be, but I just don't think it's practical for more than a handful of countries, and then it isn't really a true World Cup anymore. I do think that you could continue to stage the SWC in its current format, but have the 5 or 6 'test nations' ride matches (or series) against each other over a longer period (say 2 years) for a test championship. It works that way in cricket. You have the World Cup which every country in the world has a chance of playing in, but the 10 test nations also all play each other over a 5-year period to determine the ICC Test Rankings.

Depends on the format you use. If you use a test match format, that would rule out all except the 8 or so countries which would be strong enough to track 7 or 8 riders, not to mention that the minor nations usually only have the budget to do one or two meetings. Furthermore, where would the US and Australia ride their home matches? That was already tried with previous editions of the BSI-organised SWC (albeit using a 4TT) and it wasn't a financial success. That's basically why the SWC reverted to staging the Semi-Finals in the countries of two of the Semi-Finalists. For all its faults, the current format at least gives more countries a chance to enter and be semi-competitive, and allows Australia and the US to take part. In addition, the 4TT formats usually means at least a couple of teams in each round are competitive, whereas a test match format would lead to a lot of one-sided hammerings.

I know there isn't, but even though Linkoeping is nearer to Motala, I'd have still flown direct to Stockholm and taken my chances driving the extra couple of hours. There are also more alternative options if something goes wrong, as it did. Far enough, the guy should be commended to deciding to ride for his team on Friday, but choosing to fly through Amsterdam with a short connection was unfortunate.

Well we're still waiting. Why on earth though, would BSI/IMG want assume the financial of risk a full-time circus when they can make a reasonable return from the subsidised GPs they run now? The other question is where are they going to find more mugs... erm local promoters to host them? After all, they had to drop their plans to increase the staging fee in order to get the venues they have now.

Out of interest, I just checked the schedule to Linkoeping... The connection time in Amsterdam is just 40 minutes, which I wouldn't risk if I were flying from Heathrow (assuming he did fly from Heathrow). A delay of 20+ minutes from Heathrow is not unusual, and flights from London often land on the most distant runway at Schiphol, which is a 15-minute taxi to the terminal. Even if you made the connection, there's a good chance your luggage wouldn't. Okay, so the average person wouldn't necessarily know this, but I'm afraid if time is critical, then you should always take a direct flight.

Not so much within EU, since the penalties are quite high. The obvious question though, is why take a flight where you have to connect in the first place? Flights are often delayed these days, so I wouldn't risk a connection if a direct flight existed. Checking the schedule, there was a direct flight out of Heathrow on a Saturday that arrives at 10.25 in Stockholm, leaving plenty of time to get to Motala.

I think there's probably more to this than is being said. I haven't heard of anyone being kicked-off a flight because of overbooking in years, and you simply can't rely on flights to arrive and depart on time these days either. I suspect things were cut too fine, and the connection was too short.

There is nothing wrong with the Millenium Stadium itself. In fact, it is ideal for staging the 'main' event of the SGP calendar. The problem is actually getting to it, and the attractiveness of the location in the minds of the casual fan.

The roof at Wembley only covers the seats, but is moveable to avoid the problems you get with other large stadiums where the stands block air and light to the pitch (although it doesn't seem to have been a total success at Wembley either).

I appreciate there are ways and means, but I don't really have the time or inclination to go through some sort of masonic ritual to find them. These days, I just want to get in the car, drive directly to where I want to be, and park there (or very close to there). That you can do at Wembley, at least for the smaller events.

Because I find some of the reactionary comments against the British GP possibly being moved away from Cardiff, quite extraordinary. Are people really content to be paying absolutely outrageous prices for accommodation, and experiencing difficulty getting there either with their own cars or with public transport? I have been to the British GP in the past, but I just can't be bothered jumping through hoops to get there anymore. Public transport is not a practical proposition, and parking in some remote part of town is a bit tedious. Plus, there's the Severn Bridge toll, the perpetual roadworks on the M4 in Wales, and the seemingly ever-present traffic jam at the Newport tunnels to be negotiated. Okay, I'm admittedly not particularly interested in GPs anyway, but I'm also the average casual fan who might go if it didn't require a major logistical planning exercise to get there. In this respect, Wembley would be far more attractive, even though I'd agree it doesn't have the 'downtown' location that the Millenium Stadium does when you eventually get there. But how many more might there be if it were at Wembley? There's a choice of five airports flying from every possible destination in Europe, the Eurostar, and of course it's closer to drive to London from the Continent as well.

Absolutely not, but my point was that Cardiff isn't all that it's cracked-up to be. The British GP has essentially become the social occasion for speedway fans, but that could equally be held anywhere. I actually have nothing against Cardiff itself, which indeed a fairly pleasant city, but London is a far more attractive destination for non-diehards, especially overseas visitors. I honestly can't see a GP being held in both locations either. I suspect all this talk is to cut a better deal with Cardiff, because doesn't the Welsh tourist board bung BSI/IMG some money to stage the British GP?

Don't let details like that stand in the way of unbridalled praise for Cardiff.

Never really understood the attraction of Cardiff to be honest. Rip-off prices (particularly for a provincial city), poor public transportation, cheesy entertainment, usually pretty awful racing, and increasingly yobbish crowds it seems. I've also been reading a thread full of whinges and complaints about this year's GP, and yet the moment there's a suggestion it might go elsewhere, people start lamenting it.

I somehow doubt IMG/BSI will stage two GPs in Britain. If there is indeed a plan to go to Wembley, I suspect it might happen in 2010, and that's what all the sudden whinging about Cardiff hotels was about.

The reported figures should be taken with a pinch of salt. Last year's figures were suspiciously round at several GPs, despite not being capacity crowds. FYI, Cardiff was reported as 41,267. Certainly quite decent if anywhere close to being true, but the likely exaggerated figures for other rounds does make one wonder.

Strikes me they're looking for an excuse to move the British GP. The hotel prices have been outrageous in past years, but it didn't seem to concern them then. Ironic that IMG/BSI should be complaining about a shortage of hotels and the prices then.

I thought you were a great fan of everything SGP and IMG/BSI? How on earth would they make their money without the ability to gerrymander the competition?

I don't even think there's a speedway team anywhere in Copenhagen these days. As in most countries, capital city dwellers don't seem to be interested in speedway.

I've found that EasyJet is probably the best of the budget airlines, and is as good as many of the 'traditional' airlines. It flies to major airports, the staff are reasonably professional if you play by the rules, and the airline seems to be reasonably punctual (although delays will inevitably happen with any airline if you use them enough). Ryanair is for my money too cheap and nasty, and flying to the middle-of-nowhere is often a false economy. BMI proper is still fairly reasonable, although it seems to be focusing more on Trans-Atlantic and Middle Eastern routes now. BMI Baby is just the budget version that seems to have take over within Europe, and I can't say it's good, bad or indifferent. SkyEurope and Flybe have also always been fine when I've used them.

Both much of a muchness I'd say, but can't say I've had problems with either. SkyEurope (http://www.skyeurope.com/) also flies from Luton to Prague.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Olsen propose a GP series years previously? He may have opposed those particular FIM plans as he wasn't sufficient in on the deal, but given his later enthusiasm for the SGP, it would otherwise seem to have been a bit of an about turn.

I think though, Olsen is very much the power behind the throne of the SGP. His concept, and he says what goes. And to think people say the SGP is the future of the sport.

It's not that hard to work out though, and certainly shouldn't be beyond the abilities of a commentator and BSPA Press Officer to get right. I think it just sums up how amateur speedway is these days, even for what is supposed to be the sport's premier event.

It's not the same though. The simple fact is that the SGP would not exist without the three or four main national leagues because it doesn't pay a living wage, and is essentially skimming the cream off the top, without investing in the diary that produces the milk. I appreciate British speedway is somewhat ad-hoc about it's rider development strategy, but in general there's some modicum of commitment to actually develop and provide employment to professional riders. Yes, they can also make profits if they're clever, but they also have to run 20+ meetings a season in order provide the riders with a living wage. By contrast, the private company that runs the SGP behind the facade of 'FIM accreditation', gets the pick of the plum dates, and can choose any riders it pleases without having to pay a penny in compensation to anyone. It also only runs 11 meetings per season with a staff three or four times the size of those tracks that manage to run weekly through the season. It essentially lives parasitically off the labours of others, and if the major national leagues turned around tomorrow and said to their riders it's the SGP or us, then I think you'd think very few riders would be signed-up to the SGP. It's absolutely not fair competition at all, but more fool the professional leagues for simply standing by and letting BSI/IMG take all the money. It really shows what a clueless bunch actually run speedway.