george.m

By turning left maybe!!

If he'd focussed on turn round bends 1 and 2 a bit sharper he would have stood a much better chance than the tactic he chose.

Yeah noticed that one too!

I find it amazing that you think "nobody" considered what you're claiming!!

Wish he'd focus on commentating rather then sublimely trying to sell speedway to the watching public. It's speedway, not WWF Nigel!

Thought that was a pretty disappointing GP with little passing and effectively only 3 riders in each race with gate 1 being a graveyard.

BRILLIANT GREG!! Ha Ha Pedersen, if you'd concentrated on racing rather than stopping others you would have won that one! Ha Ha! Keep it up for the rest of the series please!!

Pearson is a joke. Similar circumstances last Grand Prix and he says Harris shouldn't have been excluded!

Emil excluded, the race shouldn't have got that far in the first place!

How was that start not called back?!

C'mon Greg!

CHAMPIONEEES!!!!!!!!! :party: :drink: :party:

A superb thread with reasoned arguments on both sides. I find it ironic that if things had been the other way around, i.e. Pedersen had come off after Harris had hit him, there would have been a lot less discussion as it's what some have come to expect of NP.

Where does it say in the rules that a rider is obliged to stay on when hit?

No you won't ... understand your diplomacy!

So you did open the link!

Congrats to all 4 for a great final!

C'mon Greg!!! C'mon Greg!!!

It's safe Paul .... honest!

"I like big butts and I cannot lie!"

Will Pedersen stay on the bike??

C'mon Greg!!!!

LOL Just what I needed to get calmed down after Pedersen's gamesmanship!

His biased interpretation of the Pedersen / Lindback incident was incredible. Think he takes the same tablets as Pedersen.

There was on my TV! And what was that reaction when Pedersen was excluded?!