stevebrum

OK, not technically a button, but easy enough to do

It was sorted out until multi banned boy changed his avater yet again and decided to play the same old games. We all know its only a matter of time before it starts all over again, and again ..................... At least the ignore button does its job tho.

It changed its title 3 times in an hour at one point yesterday. Yes they do.

Either way, i'm sure the truth is in there somewhere. It depends who has the most to lose as to who is prepared to `embellish` the most.

Hans has already stated it was an offer similar to when he first came across. Unless you claim to know better of course.

Not surprised you know those stats, bless.

Never mind, i am sure somebody will like something you say one day , just hang in there.

Correct. I take your point that it was the governing bodies. Yea, i am sure we will be discussing Schlein`s move to Kings Lynn in about 3 years time. Unless you want to keep bringing it up (so thats a possibility then). Whereas your weakness .................... is just any post you make..............

Cov made Kings Lynn buy Schlein as well.

Some clubs seem quite happy buying up all the talent, if they have the money i suppose they are entitled to do so (whether that is fair is a different matter). However no one, not even the clubs with the large asset base, saw the recession biting for as long as it has and i am sure it is affecting ALL clubs and Speedway as a whole. Now it seems that a couple of clubs are `demanding` transfer fees for their assets which in my mind is ludicrous. Those clubs must feel rather smug knowing that they could try and bankrupt a club in trying to buy a rider that wants to ride for that club all along. I didn't particularly agree that Peterborough were made to buy Batchelor in the first place, so i guess its ok that 2 wrongs make a right?? Peterborough have `apparently` tried to seek fairness for all through their actions over the past few seasons, but their actions right now show nothing of the fairness they were seeking for all. Hopefully the asset base system will be looked at seriously in any BSPA get togethers and AGM`s in the next 12-24 months. There has to be a fairer way that seems to work well in Poland and Sweden.

Wish he would make up his mind then! Bangs on about other clubs wanting his assets and they must pay but is happy to take 2 riders on loan with no fuss. Hypocrisy of the highest order.

I don't suppose anything as i wasn't able to mind-read Batchelor`s brain when he posted. Swindon - maybe, Peterborough - maybe, Belle Vue - possibly.

It is clear frost wants the rules to only favour his team, now who was it banging on about fairness for all a couple of seasons ago? As we have come to expect from the Panthers promotion - say one thing but do another. I really hope the mess that they have created gets sorted soon and the innocents in all this - the riders - can get on with trying to do their job, someything that Frost, it appears, is trying to prevent.

A panthers fan thinking there promotion is being consistent, as expected. I dont need to bad mouth the Panthers, your own assets are doing a decent enough job to escape which says all i need to know.

If it didnt say who with then its speculation who the club was.

If we werent in a double (possibly triple) dip recession it might be a reasonable request. The problem lies with the promotion who think that just because they can't use all their own assets in any one team in a season think its then ok to demand what terms those un-wanted riders are allowed to be available for to other clubs. I don`t, but the BSPA appear to. Iversen, andersen and batchelor may disagree with that comment.

aaaah, their own riders for doubling up ...... if only they had said that. Bet Lawson will feel quite lucky really, the Panthers can`t even look after their own assets. Lucky escape for the lad.

Please try keep up. Last week Lawson was told that he had no team place because they were using their own assets --------------------- then took Larsen and Fisher on loan. Like i say, double standards. What Peterborough are now after is holding the riders and clubs involved to ransom because rules havent gone the way they see fit. You say for whatever reason - the reason is clear. Peterborough want to dictate when they use their assets and on what terms to other clubs. I wish there was more riders to go around because all clubs should give doing deals with them a wide berth. Still, they know that others clubs need their riders so will stubbornly deny a rider moving, even if it means them being out of work.

Seems the goal post change season on season. Oh hang on, more like day by day, club by club, rider by rider. Swindon should claim Batch is only riding till May and then use the `Poole` rule. Just make your minds up instead of holding other teams to ransom.

Yet more double standards. How on earth has Hans "been released on December 21st" yet it will be a further month before Hans has his case heard? This follows last weeks nugget in the speedway star saying that Lawson wasnt being used because they were using their own assets. Do they make things up as they go along?? As expected the promotion want things on their terms alone. Poor Hans and Batch, bet they can`t wait to get things sorted!

Didnt the BSPA give Neils permission tho?

Don't think he will appreciate being called a mam

Thankfully sense has prevailed. Surely if it was proven that Kings Lynn had made an illegal approach then they would have rightfully been fined like Poole were last season? I guess it was an `alleged approach` that wasnt proved.

Think he should have his contract purchased. It`s only fair, as that is what Peterborough and Coventry believe is fair.

I tried to get that answered too!