stevebrum

So do Coventry, so do Eastbourne, So do Peterborough, so do Kings Lynn (to an extent). Like i have said on paper we don't look all that strong, but i would rather see the boys hit the track and turn a wheel before i condemn them to a season of misery.

seems odd considering it has only been a couple of years since he was last here , yet Judas Miedzinski hadnt ridden for a lot longer than that and kept his `false` average. But then when do we ever expect reviews and assessments to be fair and level grounded?!

Wonder why the article in SS says he is an 8 because he is a GP rider?? He already has an average??

aaaah, now i have just cottoned on why the sk8r boy remarks. So that is what it is calling itself these days, sometimes the ignore and quote button do the right job.

In fairness, no team really stands out this season and all look to have frailties. It will come down to who gels best and Wolves have just as much chance as the next team.

Have no idea what you are commenting on, i must have missing posters before you then. If its a wooosh to that, i can live with it.

To what?

Well i am I prefer Goldberg, with an i

You just making words up?

Nor would want him too. But i guess the message is clear - it is ok for an asset you don't want in the side to go out on loan season after season, but not allow another asset the same luxury.

They don't seem too bothered that Dryml is on loan continuously to Eastbourne, so can't see the difference.

Yes yes, we ALL know the politics of it all. It doesn't really matter whether i believe what is right or wrong. That is the politics of the whole situation. From a simplistic level however a rider usually rides where he wants to - and that is irregardless of the politics - as perfectly demonstrated by Troy(2010) and judas (2012).

You have a hang up on `being in the know`. Where did i ever say that by assuming something that it is in the know? I think most people assume that Troy will be at Swindon in 2013, and on loan. If they go for purchase then they will have been forced. The assumptions i make on speedway matters relates to what usually happens in the sport. Maybe Peterborough fans are too blinded to see beneath all the politics of the matter. The rider usually rides where he wants to, despite the politics. Perfect examples are troy to peterborough in 2010 and Judas Miedzinski in 2012. Of course both methods of movement were different however the the one constant was that riders went where they wanted. I'm just saying.

No secret society assumption, just sensible folk who generally know how things are usually played out. The same folk who assumed that KK was coming in to replace AM before the 2012 season started , i hasten to add.

if you want to have selective reading you will think its only a few. Some of us don't only communicate on BSF you know!

Likewise many assume Troy will go on loan to Swindon after March 1st.

Yea of course. :rofl: Loving the wit. From the 1st of Match he should be available to both. Well said. It seems some (mostly Panthers lot) seem to think that isn't relevant tho. Albeit there is a statement from the governing bodies stating Batchelor must go on a full to Swindon but from March 1st another ruling will cancel that out. Well i would imagine that is what will happen. But who knows with the ever changing goal posts of the rules!

Hopefully that will be on loan Peterborough asset and Swindon rider Troy Batchelor after March 1st.

Had never heard of it until i saw the BSPA statement today. Seems to me this is going to be squashed before it has even got off the ground. I guess even a good idea has to toe the line. I guess again that this was launched without the proper authority. I still don't quite know what to make of the whole thing anyway at this stage.

The part that is missing between 16 and 18.

Plus you probably know the same amount as the majority of us.

So many have quoted it that i thought it was a rule. I know no different, but then i am expecting the BSPA/ MC to however. You mean you don't know either? who would have thought.

Since when have any rules or rulings been applied fairly! My personal understanding of the rules is that if Swindon want to officially sign and announce Troy as a Swindon rider before March 1st then they have to buy. Surely once March 1st comes Troy will be allowed to sign for Swindon (or Belle Vue) as he is deemed available per the current rule. However that is assuming the rule applies this year, because we never really find out when and how changes are made these days.

Feel free too Most people know where i stand, and i'm usually always on update duty too

Or just wait till March 1st when he can go on loan anyway. Don`t see why it should open up any can of worms - them`s the rules apparently.