racers and royals

So we have a break before the final round in Czestochowa in September. Leaderboard after Holsted Racers and royals £800 CJ 69 £530 A Orlov £430 All to play for in the final round Cj 69 Rasmus scored you 2 points in heat 19(which you didn`t want !!)

Just watched it-sack the British Eurosport programme editor-and yes Iris not a problem with your football post(think Alan misunderstood it)Bloody Millwall thugs-I hate them more than Leeds

Teams Bydgoszcz v Grudziadz http://www.sportowefakty.pl/zuzel/wydarzenie/25295 Torun v Zielona Gora http://www.sportowefakty.pl/zuzel/wydarzenie/25240 (Dudek not riding) Gorzow v Tarnow http://www.sportowefakty.pl/zuzel/wydarzenie/25241 Also a reminder that Monday`s round 11 match is live on TV Zielona Gora v Leszno 7.15pm uk time teams http://www.sportowefakty.pl/zuzel/wydarzenie/25237 (Dudek not riding) http://soccer-live.pl/transmisje.php?id=motorsport http://www.meczyki.pl/ Bydgoszcz match should be shown on http://www.tvp.pl/player/video?id=9991243

Back to league racing next week with 2 TV matches Wednesday 13th August at 5.30pm uk time Slangerup v Fjelsted followed on Friday 15th August at 6pm uk time Outrup( region Varde) v Munkebo http://kanalsport.dk/

Dudek out of the meeting-you can edit the bet before 2pm tomorrow.

He won`t be able to concentrate on his cornflakes Dudek out of tomorrows meeting.

1 NKI 2 Kildemand 3 B Pedersen

we might just have heat 21 for tonights top 4 and then heat 22 for the top4 combined to crown the champion-but I`m not sure. Edit I`m wrong this is the final race heat 21 Meeting shown again 9 pm tonight and 9am Sunday morning

Just two rounds-but there is a grand final-I think for the top 4 combined over the 2 meetings

wrong thread-I have changed the league thread for tonight

Thanks-looks as if Hansen has replaced Madsen

I have no idea of the format for the 2nd round-and if true to form neither will the Kanal graphics man -but it should be good -all gets underway at 4.40 pm uk time on http://kanalsport.dk/

What`s Billy Hamill`s score for team managing skill !!!!!

Anyone who wants to watch it live at 2pm uk time will find a foreign commentary stream here http://soccer-live.pl/transmisje.php?id=motorsport

Official starting list of the third round of SEC in Holsted: 1. Kjastas Puodzuks Latvia 2. #69 Patryk Dudek (Poland) 3. #169 Andzejs Lebedevs (Latvia) 4. #33 Adrian Miedziński (Poland) 5. #100 Andreas Jonsson (Sweden) 6. #13 Jonas Davidsson (Sweden) 7. #25 Peter Kildemand (Denmark) 8. #27 Janusz Kołodziej (Poland) 9. #16 Niels Kristian Iversen (Denmark) 10. #313 Kenni Larsen (Denmark) 11. #19 Jurica Pavlic (Croatia) 12. #20 Tomasz Gollob (Poland) 13. #21 Maksims Bogdanovs (Latvia) 14. #89 Emil Sayfutdinov (Russia) 15. #5 Nicki Pedersen (Denmark) 16. #1 Martin Vaculik (Slovakia) 17. Patrick Hougaard (Denmark) 18. Rasmus Jensen (Denmark)

This is probably a first helpful post I have made to you-if you use edit and then full editor you can change the thread title

Of course it`s my intrepreation of the rule-just like yourself. whoever speaks to a member of the MC first hopefully can ask them.

I can`t answer it-that's why I am querying it -only the BSPA in their wisdom can answer why they have given Scunthorpe a facility-when it goes against what is currently written in the rule book-if the rule had read as I suggested it should read in my previous post then it would all be ok and everyone would be happy. I really cannot see that the BSPA have given Scunthorpe a facility on that rule -as I have stated previously that rule would NOT cover any recall for long track racing.

Yes I do say you should have a NL guest-that what the rule book only allows you to have if he is away Longtracking. As I have said before and it`s worth repeating that I am sure that previously the BSPA have not recognised the qualifiers for next year as " facility meetings" (even earlier this season if Rye house were denied a facility. If the rule book read something like "Facilities are only allowed for the day of the long track championships plus the qualifiers and challenge.The only exception is if a rider cannot possibly get to the meeting by riding the previous day then a facility will be granted for the previous day." Is that too simple and straightforward. ??

Hardly Rob the first to the insults was Long Eye. However I have been around Speedway long enough to know that the BSPA are very hot on riders facilities for Long track meetings(remember Cory Gathercole and Plymouth a few years back do you.? You and others cannot seem to grasp the difference between the 5 long track final rounds and the qualifying for next years competition-ie 2 qualifiers and a challenge final-The BSPA obviously denied rye House a facility for the qualifier(actual day of the meeting) so all us posters are doing is highlighting the inconsistances.

Are you really as thick as you are making yourself to be-if you had bothered to check the meeting Howe and Piper missed was actually "the world championship " round (1 of 5 ) Facilities are allowed for that-obviously the BSPA do not recognise the qualifying rounds for next years series as "facility granted" matches(much similar to the SEC meetings) yet suddenly come the "challenge final" Scunthorpe are granted a facility .I`m sure Len Silver and the Rye fans would love to know why they were denied a facility yet Scunthorpe are granted one !!!

So were the 2 qualifiers at Bielefeld and Tayac- did teams get a facility for riders missing for them ?? I would check Rye House v Workington on July 5th same day as Tayac to see what facility Rye House got for Tresarrieu. When you have done smart ar*e come back.

Pavlic £100 more Lebedevs £100 more

You are just being silly-these are the "speedway regulations " and it just needs one rule to cover long-track championships-every other long-track meeting cannot be considered under the regulations I repeat facilities are only considered for the "long track championships " if you can`t see that then you have been brainwashed by MR G.

I think we both know that that rule is a "speedway rule " and that long-track is adequately covered by the rule I have quoted