It's just a feeling I have. If Poole had Garrity and Coventry Newman, I would expect him to do the same with Garrity.
I don't think he is anti-Poole as such, just probably bored/annoyed about Poole's win ratio over last few years and wants anyone to beat us.
What part of this post makes sense then? 'if you ignore all the good riders he beats' why ignore just the good?
'ignore the points he scores' which would mean no points
If you said that about every rider then you could say they were 'crap' as you put it.
As I say makes no sense...
Surely this has been done to death already! Kyle wanted to ride in 1-5 same as Garrity, but Kyle waiting a month to do it means it helps the team out a lot, whereas Garrity has messed up Coventry's team building.
Although we don't always get our own way! A couple of years ago, tried to get the sharing no1 position for Darcy and Chris that didn't happen at the time.
So you don't have any examples to back up your argument then? If other promoters agree with rules that suit Matt Ford/Poole then that's their lookout! Matt has suggested rules that riders want as well. Like, Magnus Zetterstrom wanted riders at no2 starting on the inside gates in heat 1. No comment!