LisaColette

The ones you are quoting are October averages! Pickering fits at Poole with extra 5%.

At least he has Zach in the ambulance with him, but doesn't sound to good. Hope he isn't badly hurt.

Killeen form slightly dipped unless Poole is just his best track!

How is that even possible when 1st leg is at Oxford!

You would think they would go for Rowe at Oxford.

I'd try and hang on to Sam Hagon if he wanted to stay as will only improve imo.

If you want to share out top riders equally then that is the only way to do it imo.

In my experience watching the playoffs it is very hard to pull a lead back. Even 8 points can be challenging. It is just different to normal league aggregate meetings. BV know they can just sit on 3-3s and frustrate Sheffield and then they over try and potentially get excluded from crashing or causing them etc.

Didn't he get 7 which was OK I thought. Don't blame us! He was just as bad at Poole, i think there was a time when he was swearing at MF in an argument. He just hasn't changed at all. Although I don't remember any problems with fans. Considering he has a child now you would think he would be nicer to other people's.

Nope not seen anything yet. Will catch up later when I'm not so busy 😀

Because you didn't have Cook or Vissing!

You know you have Batch right who is the biggest hater of wet tracks 😁

No, if it got called off you still need to knock us out first 🤦‍♀️😉

Be interesting if it did get called off as Tom Brennan has been called up to do SEC next Saturday!

I was thinking that last night!

Unless we ride on a Friday.

And Dickson said at Lawson's testimonial that he wants him at Leicester next year.

Or Sheffield have said 'no guesting'. I'd go for Bomber, the playoffs wouldn't be the same without him!

It was a few years ago on the Poole stream, I think it was Cami that said that he didn't want it going to 14-16 points, as it prob too much to make up. Also Middlo has said in the past keep it within 10, no more than that.

Yes, agree it will help with the crowd. My point is a lot of TMs say 14 is too much to make up that is why they want 10 and under and 12 being borderline. Worky will need to bang in heat advantages from the get go, whereas Poole can afford to sit on 3-3s. See what happens.

Not very sporting of you. Been getting tips off the Aussie cricket team 😉😁

That's not going to keep happening though. Just think teams need to aim for under 10 to have a good chance and sometimes seen teams with 4-6 point leads go through, so 14 will be hard work but not impossible.

Worky are a bit negative imo. Most teams when they are away in playoffs say no more than 8-10 points, but Worky are happy with 14? Never heard any team say that before, not even in the Prem. Interesting that Flint is a lot better at Poole when not riding for Glasgow! Five points more and way better than Vissing. I would say Tate be getting 8-10 points at Poole on a third visit (especially if he stayed at no2 - not sure if they would have moved him to 3 or 4) so lost out there and never know what Craig Cook is going to do at Poole so on a bad night pretty equal with Kerr. Edit - would have been better for my heart having a 28 point lead but no good for a neutral or Worky fan, so also means we shouldn't get complacent 🤞

Good job the playoffs aren't actually that predictable!!