LisaColette

Unless it is Ben or Zach, then no it isn't positive! 😉 More likely Worky are worried about not getting a no1. Especially if Oxford and Glasgow manage to have a couple of them in their sides.

Not every match. Poole still staging the Harbour Masters individual on Weds. They don't need to step aside just because they don't want to lose a lot of money by stepping up to the Prem. It was reported on here by a poster that not one prem club made a profit this season. So why would you? Even though i would quite like to watch prem racing again, i get why they don't. Business wise it makes zero sense. Exactly, Sheffield prime example.

If Dan is riding in the UK anyway then i don't see what his issue is? If anyone should have an issue it, should be Lambert. Has he said anything yet?

Hasn't stopped Berwick! So things must be pretty much agreed. Probably Prem holding everything up as usual 😉

Thought that was next Saturday? 24th?

Tbf he also thinks it is 2927 next year, so there is no hope! Interesting that Oxford going for top heavy and Berwick more strength in depth. Though not sure how much is left for final 2.

Next year is fine then? 😁 He only just got a handle on the Poole track halfway through this season, so prob a bit too early to be a Poole rider. Plus the way he was over celebrating beating Poole riders in playoff final, a few Poole fans didn't like that right @Arthur54 😉

He didn't tell them so much what to say. If i understood what was said correctly, i think it is more of what they said to him in the appeal, made public. So fans don't think he is just moaning about every decision or whatever.

If you listen to 360 podcast it has David Howe on and he did say he thinks he pushed the SCB into making that statement and thinks they didn't want to make it 🤷‍♀️

Mitch over Kyle for sure. One is young and improving and one is at their level. Edit - although expect Mitch to be at Oxford?

Well if other teams are worried about Oxford and Glasgow top end strength then they could still do a u turn at agm yet and go for 38!

8.64 with 2.5% off? Pretty much half the points on 2 riders 👀. Be interesting what they do with bottom half of the team.

Wow, didn't realise it went that high! Not sure about the conversion but must be quite low prem average so i would guess about 8.

Can forget about Poole ever moving back up then as race nights are a deal breaker.

Guess that means Lawson is back then. They better tell him no Denmark 🙄🙄🙄

Has to be converted surely as feel like to went to around 8 when at Poole.

Thought Garrity in prison again? That what they are saying on his thread.

Make it so clubs want to move up? Let Poole ride on Weds 👀🙃

Doesn't look like it Discretion and Review Timeframe: A referee has full discretion to review an incident before the result is officially declared. They can consult with assistant officials, review track side evidence, or take a moment to evaluate a crash before making their final call, but that power effectively freezes once the result is locked into the official score sheet. [1, 2, 3] The Post-Meeting Appeal Process: If a team believes a rule was broken or a gross misjudgment occurred, they cannot force the referee to change it during the meeting. Instead, the club must lodge a formal, written appeal with the SCB after the meeting concludes. However, even during an official post-meeting appeal, changing the actual recorded on-track result is incredibly rare due to anti-retrospective rules.

Tbf his first season of being this busy, so would be interesting to hear if he thinks it is too much racing or if he feels the amount is ok.

Now we have really entered fantasy land. They are never going to do that!

Not necessary need to be crossed. The infield includes the white line according to our good friend Google and Mr Howe. So rear tyre only need to be on it to be excluded. I haven't been on any other SM to see what has been said yet but if that is happening on FB, i am not surprised!

Yeah, but they say that includes being on the white line, which no one disputed. Just that some of us thought you could have rear wheel on the white line and not be excluded. Only both fully over. Now the rule has been cleared up, that's fair enough. No argument from me. Definitely got away with two decisions!

You can pay the extra rent then!

I thought David Howe said it can be on the line or starting to cross over and that is the interpretation they used?