So Bowden's licence hasn't been revoked - "Chairman Alex Harkness has made it clear that the pre annual meeting did not have the authority to revoke anybody's licence"
Ok Mr Harkness, which meeting has got the authority then? Reading between the lines is dangerous, I know, but something has sparked this frenzy off is Bowden in or out? Is the only reason it hasn't been revoked is that the meeting didn't have the authority? Did they try to revoke it but couldn't because they didn't have the authority? Will bulldozing the arena improve facilities and give the consortium a better basis to work from? Is Bowden threatening criminal damage? What did the police officers do on the last 2 Friday's instead of visiting St. Boniface arena?
Is there really a solicitor who will listen to this cock?
"These comments are damaging my business by suggesting my licence has been revoked. He added: "I have decided to take legal advice over the comments made on these forums and possibly take further action."
So Mr Bowden, you've threatened to close it, you've threatened to sell it, you've threatened not to sell it, you've denied it's for sale to a consortium, you've announced a consortium is buying it, you've threatened to bulldoze it, you've acknowledged you've had cashflow problems, you've not been able to pay your riders, you've had the police on site on at least 2 occasions, your family members and associates have allegedly been brawling in public, you've finished bottom of the league, your Team Manager will not work with you if the bid fails - all of this played out in the public domain and you want me to represent you because your customers are damaging your business?
I think it's a bit ******* late for that Mike!