Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Little Nicki

Members
  • Posts

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Little Nicki

  1. Pardon? (Do I have a troll?) Is telling the truth your strong point? Got that evidence about Rod North yet? 'Door opening implement'. No, I have two trolls. Thanks 'Fred', 'Drop A Cog/d' or whoever you are today. Your comments smell very fishy and you are so obviously angling for a bite. But I won't oblige. Good 'cod' man/woman, you give me a 'haddock'. Not exactly the life and 'sole' of the party are you. 'Salmon' should really find a nice quiet 'plaice' for you to while away the rest of your days in the sun's 'rays', especially when you start to lose your 'herring'. The future is looking 'bleak' for you and not 'brill'. 'Betta' take a rest now. You have made so many 'barb'ed comments on here. Constantly 'carp'ing on and 'Dab'ing your toe in the water. Some of your posts deserve an 'oscar', but mostly make you seem like a stupid boy 'Pike'. Such a load of old 'pollocks'. Almost like using a 'sprat' to catch a 'mackerel'. 'Saury' even you know by now that your cover has been blown and you are 'Skate'ing on thin ice. 'Hake', there's a nasty 'tench' in this forum now. Now, back on your 'perch' and stop stalking me.
  2. No, not Gavan in disguise, or drag, just another Forum member affected by your imbecilic, rude, biased, uneducated, sad comments that pollute the Threads you post them on, enhanced by the use of childish emoticons such as or , and hackneyed expressions like: 'keep taking the medicine', 'go finish your homework' or 'go play with the traffic' and the use of the expression 'mate' or 'dear' when the person you are referring to is never going to be your mate and would never hold you dear. You say there is really no point in responding to me, well please hold yourself true to that and do not respond to this post and let the Thread get back on track now. Although you seem always to need to have the last word, so won't be surprised if another banal post is proferred.
  3. Oh dear. I wasn't referring to you reasoning with 'anti Poole bashers', I was referring to your comments on this Thread which are unreasoned and simply snipe at other posters' opinions and their clubs. Your latest response, 'Well then that is pathetic', endorses this and is just that. At times like this, I am reminded of the saying: 'Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience'.
  4. Thanks, but it was a comment about two different riders that should have been separated by a paragraph, but no thanks on either of them.
  5. Don't go shovelling your rubbish in Scunthorpe's direction. It was obvious from his visit last year with a Danish touring team that Karger was not up to PL standard. You brought him in on an assessed average. You deal with it.
  6. Typical, 'you must be anti-Poole' comment. Some people reason their comments, some just snipe and can't see beyond their own club. Which one you fit into is not open to debate.
  7. Shame you won't. Same old hackneyed comebacks with the addition of a . You seem to know a lot about medication. Bi-polar tendencies evident for some time. If you sold toilet tissue instead of the Speedway Star, would your pseudonym be 'asswipeman'? Guess your easy to pick out at Wimborne Road on a Wednesday night. 14,818 and counting.
  8. Smug, really? (Don't believe that I am an Edinburgh supporter). Well, I would like to assure you that was not the case and I wholeheartedly and unreservedly apologise for any such inference in my previous posts. In four weeks, we will see which part of the country draws Ty to it.
  9. Gee thanks Hagon. EDIT: to say - think of a game which used to be played by people squeezing into a confined space and a 1970's bottle of wine in an odd shaped bottle that people used to put candles in once they'd drunk it and has become popular again recently. Imagine, it's easy if you try.
  10. Rather say 'may' than lie about something I can't prove. Unlike some posters. 2,600+ posts - was any of them worthwhile or add anything to the rich pageantry of speedway life? Door opening implement.
  11. 'bollocks' and 'anal' - interesting words to use. Maybe just consider where BWitcher lives these days and why he has ended up there? Not exactly a hotbed of speedway.
  12. So, not feeling so confident now then? You may not have said that, but you did suggest that I must be feeling self-satisfied. I asked you why politely, but you did not respond. Should I take it that you know more about self-satisfaction than most?
  13. Amazing? Why? Once a Victorian, always a Victorian. As I said, time will tell. Many a slip twixt cup and lip and all that. Not quite sure why you guys are so confident about obtaining Ty's services though or why Lewy assumes extra rides via a possible Cup run and play-offs' against guaranteed extra rides at Scunthorpe. Lewy has not been the font of all knowledge in the past if I remember rightly.
  14. Seems to me that you cannot spell words properly and that you would be the perfect implement to pop a balloon with.
  15. And he didn't say Pboro either did he? An Aussie would feel at home with the Panthers current line-up? Maybe consider whose recommendation he would take and where he would gain most points? Time will tell of course.
  16. Would he? You know his mind that well do you? Time will tell of course. Plenty of points money to be earned with both teams. Maybe more at Scunthorpe? Who knows what sponsorship may have been lined up and whose recommendation Ty will have followed - him being an Australian and all that.
  17. As much as I am pleased that your team is in existence still, I doubt that they will be Title contenders.
  18. Don't forget that you beat Ipswich at home last week, who beat Panthers on Thursday. Grondal scoring well tonight made the difference. One change by Rye House and the team will do better than expected when all the 'doom & gloom' was around at the start of the season. Your management are serious, professional motor sport people. They will accept setbacks and improve where necessary. Proctor due in UK in four weeks time and on his way to Scunthorpe.
  19. Using the Royal 'We' again. There may be a gap between the PL and the EL, but it is nowhere near the vacant gap between your ears. 14,800+ posts. Was one of them worth the effort, time or bandwidth?
  20. Presume Kennett in for Lawson for Lakeside. Could be very close. AJ may go unbeaten. Sam Masters and the home Reserves may just swing it in Wolves favour. Will the Revolution Jawas suit Monmore? May be a draw?
  21. Ty Proctor tweeted yesterday that he had four weeks before he was able to return to the UK: https://twitter.com/typroctor20/status/720988730589220864
  22. Damn! Might divert to Hoddesdon now then. Thanks for posting that on here.
  23. Not very professional = unprofessional, so no, I meant what I wrote. Maybe you read it incorrectly? And that seems to be the crux of the matter. They were required before and in time for the track to be ready for the GOM, but they either weren't or, if they were, then they were not used. And yes, we get it that Manchester City Council are in charge of the project. I know nothing about construction, laying tracks, sub-soil constituency or any of the issues that have led to this situation, but if, for example, I was having a house built, I would most probably take an interest and check that my requirements were being met at all times and that the contractor was using the materials that had been agreed upon and paid for, and that the footings had been dug down to and constructed to specification. Your post suggests that the Clerk of Works is responsible for this situation. If that is the case, I wouldn't want to be in their shoes.
  24. So we are now being told that it is down to the materials used in the sub-soil base under bend 3, that the correct materials were used on bends 1 & 2, but not on bends 3 & 4, and that it is down to the cold weather rather than the rain, as the drainage system is working but that water is seeping up from the sub-soil. There was obviously an element of the completion of the project being rushed, but we are told that the time-frame wasn't the issue, the use of incorrect materials is. Looking at the images made available on this forum a few weeks prior to the GOM, it was obvious it was going to be rushed and that the elements, snow, cold weather and rain would not assist in this. But the project wasn't started only a few weeks before the date of the GOM, was it? The project has been on-going for years. Materials would have been agreed on, ordered and delivered weeks in advance. Are we to believe that no-one, be it the Belle Vue management, track curator, Council, whoever, did not ensure that the correct materials were in place and checked off? Maybe not 'Mickey Mouse', but not very professional and with, at least, elements of Donald *uck, Goofy and Droopy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy