-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By szkocjasid · Posted
Fair point, for the majority of 2.00 riders that would be the case. Only the most promising are in a position to chase better deals at other clubs. However even if Poole are in the right, saying our number 7 will only get 3 rides most matches & potential number 7s are in the wrong for demanding 4 rides minimum. It still means Poole (or any club) could potentially miss out on their preferred rider. Probably less likely to happen at Poole as most riders like going there & have a great chance of winning trophies. -
By foreverblue · Posted
Max was given time but he wasnt good enough, cant see him staying at Glasgow all season. -
By bigcatdiary · Posted
You can never budget for injuries, you just have some years when nothing goes right, just ask Ipswich -
By bigcatdiary · Posted
Lindgren is a better option, why didn’t they get him back. Tungate is a trapper, I just cannot see him covering the position when looking at the other teams best riders, he also is a let down on some of the tracks. Riss is in because of Shrek, he didn’t cut it last year and until Gusts settles down Riss will be in the top 5.
-